If they found out who Q is they would crap themselves and curl up in the fetal position while babbling incoherently.
Of course that is not that much different from normal for the liberals.
agreed
Everybody and his mother thinks they know who Q is.
You know, one of the theories that I’m not sure I agree with but is extremely interesting to me is that Q is someone close to Durham.
Is it true, I read it elsewhere, but you guys can confirm to me, that Q drops started on the day that Durham was activated? Of all the things that many Q followers think of as “proofs“, many of them patently ridiculous, that one would be pretty spot on and almost undeniable.
I've read this, that Q started the same day Durham was appointed. I didn't personally verify it but no reason to doubt it.
And that first post showed the 'Durham' boat (in the famous painting) that Washington crossed the Delaware in.
Later in another post Q confirmed that an 'autist' had correctly identified a clue, that this boat was a Durham boat, invented by Robert Durham. The clue obviously was that John Durham would be key to everything.
A few days ago Trump in a statement purposely misstated John Durham's name as 'Robert Durham.' Obviously confirming Q once again.
I doubt John himself is Q (like you say) but likely a part of the team. Q of course is supposedly a group of not more than ten, most of which are military.
I think Dan Scavino is part of the group.
There's too much evidence that Q and Trump are tied at the hip, so I've always said, if Q is 'bad' then Trump is bad.
So if the logic is that Q is a psy op and that Trump is a crypto jew then fine, that's logical. But to say that Trump is 'good' but Q is not, is not logical.
A lot of bad info does indeed come from overzealous Q followers, like the John Kennedy Jr. theory, the press takes that and runs with it and paints everyone as kooks.
(post is archived)