10% chance? Yeah right. I'm sure it's missing a zero.
10% chance? Yeah right. I'm sure it's missing a zero.
Agree!
Agree!
“Oh dear, it would certainly have been better if the CDC stated the “genomic sequencing” was for the virus. Alas, in their Twitter announcement the CDC left the possibility of genomic tracing for the individual person tested open to interpretation.”
“Oh dear, it would certainly have been better if the CDC stated the “genomic sequencing” was for the virus.
Alas, in their Twitter announcement the CDC left the possibility of genomic tracing for the individual person tested open to interpretation.”
Another theory that has proven correct.
Another theory that has proven correct.
Yes, our theories become proofs :-)
Yes, our theories become proofs :-)
I hated Trigonometry, but it was all proofs. The teacher was fun and entertaining, he'd talk about Seinfeld and ice hockey on his tangents. He'd be talking about the lesson and then just work in plays from the previous night or week.
I hated Trigonometry, but it was all proofs. The teacher was fun and entertaining, he'd talk about Seinfeld and ice hockey on his tangents. He'd be talking about the lesson and then just work in plays from the previous night or week.
It’s so much easier to pay attention when something is interesting.
It’s so much easier to pay attention when something is interesting.
Another article, Newsweek https://archive.ph/GCcMQ
Another article, Newsweek
https://archive.ph/GCcMQ
(post is archived)