WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

438

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-files-suit-prevent-missouri-restricting-enforcement-federal-firearms-laws Missouri House Bill 85 Makes Enforcement of Federal Firearms Laws More Difficult, Thereby Impeding Law Enforcement Efforts to Combat Violent Crime

The Department of Justice has today filed a lawsuit to prevent the State of Missouri from enforcing House Bill 85 (H.B. 85). Signed into law in June 2021, the Missouri law declares five categories of federal firearms laws “invalid” and deters and penalizes their enforcement by federal, state and local law enforcement officers. The government’s complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief prohibiting enforcement of H.B. 85 and further clarifying that state and local officials may lawfully participate in joint federal task forces, assist in the investigation and enforcement of federal firearm crimes, and fully share information with the federal government without fear of H.B. 85’s penalties. Specifically, the complaint alleges that H.B. 85 is invalid under the Supremacy Clause, is preempted by federal law, and violates the doctrine of intergovernmental immunity.

“This act impedes criminal law enforcement operations in Missouri,” said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland. “The United States will work to ensure that our state and local law enforcement partners are not penalized for doing their jobs to keep our communities safe.”

“A state cannot simply declare federal laws invalid,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian M. Boynton, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “This act makes enforcement of federal firearms laws difficult and strains the important law enforcement partnerships that help keep violent criminals off the street.”

The complaint alleges that the restrictions imposed by H.B. 85 have hindered cooperation and other activities that assist federal, state, and local law enforcement efforts. Federal law enforcement agencies within the state report that enforcement of federal firearms laws in Missouri has grown more difficult since H.B. 85 became effective. The penalties associated with H.B. 85 have prompted state and local agencies and individuals within those entities to withdraw support for federal law enforcement efforts, including by not sharing critical data used to solve violent crimes and withdrawing from joint federal task forces. The complaint challenges the constitutionality of the law and seeks to enforce the supremacy of federal law. Dozens of state and local officers have resigned from federal joint-task forces in the state as a result of the law. According to Missouri’s own statistics, nearly 80% of violent crimes are committed with firearms.

According to the complaint, Missouri enacted H.B. 85 despite its conflict with the fundamental constitutional principles of supremacy of federal law, preemption, and intergovernmental immunity. The restrictions imposed by the statute are premised on a declaration that several categories of federal statutes are “invalid,” but a state may not lawfully declare federal law invalid under the Constitution. In addition to penalizing individuals for working on joint federal-state law enforcement task forces, the statute penalizes current federal employees by barring them from state employment if they enforced the purportedly invalid laws. The statute further directs the state judiciary to “protect” against the federal laws declared invalid.

Attachment(s): Download Missouri HB85 Comlaint Component(s): Civil Division Office of the Attorney General Press Release Number: 22-136 Updated February 16, 2022

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-files-suit-prevent-missouri-restricting-enforcement-federal-firearms-laws Missouri House Bill 85 Makes Enforcement of Federal Firearms Laws More Difficult, Thereby Impeding Law Enforcement Efforts to Combat Violent Crime The Department of Justice has today filed a lawsuit to prevent the State of Missouri from enforcing House Bill 85 (H.B. 85). Signed into law in June 2021, the Missouri law declares five categories of federal firearms laws “invalid” and deters and penalizes their enforcement by federal, state and local law enforcement officers. The government’s complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief prohibiting enforcement of H.B. 85 and further clarifying that state and local officials may lawfully participate in joint federal task forces, assist in the investigation and enforcement of federal firearm crimes, and fully share information with the federal government without fear of H.B. 85’s penalties. Specifically, the complaint alleges that H.B. 85 is invalid under the Supremacy Clause, is preempted by federal law, and violates the doctrine of intergovernmental immunity. “This act impedes criminal law enforcement operations in Missouri,” said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland. “The United States will work to ensure that our state and local law enforcement partners are not penalized for doing their jobs to keep our communities safe.” “A state cannot simply declare federal laws invalid,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian M. Boynton, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “This act makes enforcement of federal firearms laws difficult and strains the important law enforcement partnerships that help keep violent criminals off the street.” The complaint alleges that the restrictions imposed by H.B. 85 have hindered cooperation and other activities that assist federal, state, and local law enforcement efforts. Federal law enforcement agencies within the state report that enforcement of federal firearms laws in Missouri has grown more difficult since H.B. 85 became effective. The penalties associated with H.B. 85 have prompted state and local agencies and individuals within those entities to withdraw support for federal law enforcement efforts, including by not sharing critical data used to solve violent crimes and withdrawing from joint federal task forces. The complaint challenges the constitutionality of the law and seeks to enforce the supremacy of federal law. Dozens of state and local officers have resigned from federal joint-task forces in the state as a result of the law. According to Missouri’s own statistics, nearly 80% of violent crimes are committed with firearms. According to the complaint, Missouri enacted H.B. 85 despite its conflict with the fundamental constitutional principles of supremacy of federal law, preemption, and intergovernmental immunity. The restrictions imposed by the statute are premised on a declaration that several categories of federal statutes are “invalid,” but a state may not lawfully declare federal law invalid under the Constitution. In addition to penalizing individuals for working on joint federal-state law enforcement task forces, the statute penalizes current federal employees by barring them from state employment if they enforced the purportedly invalid laws. The statute further directs the state judiciary to “protect” against the federal laws declared invalid. Attachment(s): Download Missouri HB85 Comlaint Component(s): Civil Division Office of the Attorney General Press Release Number: 22-136 Updated February 16, 2022

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

“The United States will work to ensure that our state and local law enforcement partners are not penalized for doing their jobs to keep our communities safe.”

I care more about our constitutional rights to bear arms than do about "safe communities". "Communities" sounds communist. Arm the people and they'll take care of their neighborhoods no matter how many guns the bad guys get.

[–] 2 pts

IKR

ATF is butt Hurt over that state law... that Law protects our Constitutional Rights that the ATF stole from us ..

Lets see how this plays out in court...

[–] 3 pts

Spot on Knight. I love listening to their tried and true rhetoric. It never changes. Tell the people it's for safety and then try to take away their constitutional rights. Those tactics have worked in the past but many of us are on to them. Armed citizens with Constitutional rights that hold up in court is all "communities" need to be safe.

[–] 1 pt

Let the feds enforce it. No state resources for fed laws.

[–] 2 pts

The Sate law takes away some of the ATF restrictions and Keeps the ATF from enforcing their unconstitutional laws inside that states border

States are starting to take their rights back .. and it is Glorious to see.....

[–] 1 pt

The federal laws are horseshit. What the fuck do these people not understand about "shall not be infringed".

[–] 1 pt

BOOM Brother that is exactly what is happening here. The State is taking its rights back from the fed

[–] 1 pt

Any law that conflicts with the US. Constitution and Bill of Rights is Null and void. The 2nd Amendment is not up for debate or change by this liberal/communist Coup.

[–] 1 pt

Another law is Title 18 US Code s/s 242
What is the punishment if cause death or kills someone?
every suicide is a death they caused.
every death by jab is a person they killed .

Add Article 4 sec 4 US Constitution ( define the word: guarantee )

Guarantee a Republican Form of Government Guarantee Protection from Invasion Guarantee Protection of Domestic Violence ( gov guarantees to protect the many from the few)

These two alone are enough to HANG Fraudchi and company .. And every Media Pundit that KNOWINGLY pushed the evil....
ALONG with every States Attorney Generals that conspired to help ...

Q was way off the mark on this one thing > "These people are stupid " > biggest understatement since the Earth was created..

[–] 1 pt

The END should be when 'Ivermectin' gets into court And the Public finds out that the 'Cure' for this Flu was and is being withheld by the fauci/CDC/FDA/AMA/WHO criminals. How many deaths would Have been prevented by Ivermectin and HCQ? The class action should get Billions before the hangings.