Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

I don't trust Elon Musk or his Starlink.

I don't believe that Truth Social will depend on Starlink.

I believe that Space Force has been quietly involved in developing a new internet system based on satellite relays that avoid the older ground-based infrastructure.

If you read the linked article, you'll notice that it never mentions how Hewlett Packard, Apple, or any other hardware manufacturers retain legal ownership of their products. Just look at the user accounts on an HP system running Windows and you'll see that HP has an admin account that can't be removed. Microsoft also forces upgrades that you can't stop from being installed. That's forced ownership.

The article talks about (as an analogy) how building material suppliers could come in and take away the materials used to build your house. It's the same thing with your internet devices. They retain ownership and can remotely disable your ability to use them at any time. It's all built into the hardware/software.

The only way around this is to do away with their ability to access your devices remotely. This is where a totally new infrastructure comes into play.

DARPA was behind the development of the current internet. DARPA chose or helped to develop the companies that would become the main providers of hardware and software, and worked with them in developing both the hardware/software and the terms of service that users would have to comply with. It's the terms of service that allow these manufacturers to retain legal ownership of your hardware and software.

Your current devices can still be used on a new internet infrastructure without concern about these company's terms of service or their ability to disable your devices. The new infrastructure will bypass their ability to access your hardware/software, which is what these companies rely on to do so.

Elon Musk is up to something, and I think it's an attempt to jack into the new infrastructure in order to allow these DARPA-chosen companies to retain their ability to access your hardware/software. Starlink has had a number of 'mysterious' problems over it's short history, and I believe this is due to Space Force taking action to stop the hijacking attempts.

We can only have a truly free internet when these companies no longer have the power they built into the old system to control your access.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Who can afford " starlink " ? Did you ever go to the hompage and look at the cost ?

https://www.starlink.com/

I read your comments on Musk being a fraud. I can't comment one way or another, but I can rattle off a ton of data I've digested. We'll have to wait and see. I don't believe in rockets, satelites or space travel for starters, throw in nukes while we're at it and the earth being round, flat, hollow or having two holes in the poles and an inner sun. NASA has been all about theft and using science as another psychological weapon. So most of us can't point to the truth, because we don't have it. So Musks involvement in space is towing the line. He embarrassed NASA doing it FASTER, CHEAPER, BETTER ! I watched the last Falcon 9 launch the Italian Sat last week live, with the booster flying back to the Cape. Impressive. But did I just watch a large firework and drone show ? With that giant Crown Nebula exhaust and all, directly overhead. Impressive. But we cannot prove what happens after. Watch the PBS Voyager documentary for a real laugh on the two probes form the 1970's, total joke.

My point is that if we have no satellites and they just skim the signals off the upper atmosphere as DOC RAM says, than Starlink Can exist as well, so it really does not matter for now. Can they pull off a global network and transfer the entire system piece by piece, maybe. If we have to rebuild from the ashes, that sounds about right. But Dr. Richard Allen Miller will tell you himself that space travel is not possible by means of rockets because of no known protection from Gamma Rays alone. So All the Mars Rocket talk, Moon base talk and past space travel is a giant theft operation. You would need to travel through worm holes like they describe in project PEGASUS etc. Like the Stargate TV show. Anyway, I got off on a tangent, but its basically related.

For now its the old fashioned way, undersea cables and such. Everything is so drip, drip, drip we are years away from anything. Tesla told us 100 years ago about whats possible and Rockets are 100 years obsolete with all fuels designed to poison us and the planet.

In reality your going to need to destroy most hardware/software and rebuild from the ground up globally. That goes for most things. Its not hard really. You cannot allow an Apple, Microsoft, any DARPA based program to continue based on its evil roots. You go back to the real days of TESLA and start over. Musk knows Tesla and seems to play both sides of the fence like a Rouge Tony Stark.

[–] • 0 pt

Can they pull off a global network and transfer the entire system piece by piece, maybe.

They don't need to transfer the entire current system over.They don't need to copy the design of that infrastructure at all. Currently it's designed in a way that certain NGOs have control of certain parts of it that interlock to create a system that allows this group of NGOs to control all aspects of it, not just the hardware/software, but the storage space, data hubs and other traffic flow routes like cell towers, etc. By replacing all that with new space-based technologies, people can interface both the old and new systems at the same time, and as the old system crumbles, the new system will be expanded to take up the slack while providing the sort of services we were promised early on but never got or were slowly taken away.

You would need to travel through worm holes like they describe in project PEGASUS etc. Like the Stargate TV show.

I wouldn't put too much belief in what TV shows depict as science. They take cutting edge theories and ideas and make them seem possible with a lot of illusion and imagination.

For now its the old fashioned way, undersea cables and such. Everything is so drip, drip, drip we are years away from anything. Tesla told us 100 years ago about whats possible

Tesla based his ideas on what little was known about electricity during his time, and he was wrong about certain things. Fiber-optic cables send data across the ocean at near light speed, not drip drip drip. We don't really need ant more speed as end users anyway. The extra speed is useful within the main data servers that have to sort, catalog, search, and retrieve data as it flows through the system. Using space-based technologies, superconductors that require zero kelvin temperatures for faster data handling, solar energy power supplies, lasers, etc. can be used to replace the old system with better functionality.

In reality your going to need to destroy most hardware/software and rebuild from the ground up globally. That goes for most things. Its not hard really. You cannot allow an Apple, Microsoft, any DARPA based program to continue based on its evil roots.

You don't need to destroy anything right away, but improvements can be made in the hardware architecture and software programming over time, when and where necessary. DARPA owns the patents on many of the components, as do Microsoft and Apple, but DARPA is government and Microsoft and Apple may just lose everything through seizures before this is all over. It will go into the hands of a government that's serving the people and not the other way around.

[–] • 0 pt

Wow. That is thoughtful and well written.

[–] • 0 pt

You know I've been thinking about this....wondering if Starlink is why Musk feels (and behaves) as if he is invincible.....like he has an agreement and no one can touch him.

[–] • 1 pt

Musk is a fraud. The article wants you to believe that Starlink is involved in developing Truth Social. I don't think it is.

See my other comment in this thread.