WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

Notice the studies are showing the studies were done in 2017.

Notice the studies are showing the studies were done in 2017.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

well she wrote in her own article that it wasn't scientific

"However, none of the observations discussed here prove this linkage. Specifically, the evidence does not confirm causation. Clearly COVID-19 occurs in regions with little wireless communication. Furthermore, the relative morbidity caused by WCR exposure in COVID-19 is unknown"

This guff is basically self published and made to look like a recognised journal publication.

She's got a thing about 5G and bangs on about it everywhere, covid is just this weeks bogeyman that she wants to link it to. Next year it will be cancer or ingrowing toenails.

This scientific report supports her:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8580522/

[–] 0 pt (edited )

nope, read the paper

Beverly Rubik, that's her at the top, she wrote it....

.

"However, none of the observations discussed here prove this linkage. Specifically, the evidence does not confirm causation. Clearly COVID-19 occurs in regions with little wireless communication. Furthermore, the relative morbidity caused by WCR exposure in COVID-19 is unknown."

"NLM is not a publisher, but rather collects, indexes, and archives scientific literature published by other organizations. The presence of any article, book, or document in these databases does not imply an endorsement of, or concurrence with, the contents by NLM, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), or the U.S. Federal Government."

"The paper also underwent a biased peer review process conducted by vocal anti-5G advocates"

The authors of the study are an adjunct professor in the mind-body medicine department at Saybrook University and a radiologist not currently affiliated with an academic institution

One of the papers they cited on COVID-19 and 5G said, "The fact is that there is no link be­tween the COVID-19 virus and 5G cell phone technology or 5G base-station communication towers. These are to­tally different constructs; they are not even close."

The authors of the paper also acknowledge that they only selected sources that supported their theory, ignoring papers that showed negative results. "We did not make an attempt to weigh the evidence," they wrote. Of the over 30,000 research reports on radiofrequency radiation exposure the authors note are available in the literature, they only cited 90. One of them is an anonymously published 2014 paper by one of the authors, which is not peer reviewed. Eight others are authored by the peer reviewers who evaluated their paper.

Of the 10 listed reviewers, two of whom requested anonymity, half are vocal public opponents of 5G. They include vaccine skeptic Ronald Kostoff; Martin Pall, whose own theory about a connection between 5G and COVID-19 was shared on social media by actor Woody Harrelson; and David O. Carpenter, whose efforts at circulating inaccurate data on the health risks of wireless technology stoked fears over 5G. Two other reviewers signed a 2017 petition urging the European Union to stop the rollout of 5G.