WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

846

What hunt ? These people are sick. What's next kids ?

What hunt ? These people are sick. What's next kids ?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

LOlz, You're the one clearly butthurt and telling other people that they are dismissed, and only bc your comment doesn't get the appreciation you think it deserves ... and again your comment for a longer hunting season is a non starter and moot - just bc you have an idea doesn't make it a good idea nor feasible, nor should others not point that out if they wish too - you trying to shut down someones free speech bc they disagree with you - get over yourself , Geez.

Plus You clearly haven't understood the agi-prop reporting of this whole article is designed to elicit an emotional response in readers which you have fallen for.
You are honesty saying 37 000 hectares is to small an area to hunt animals on bc it is fenced ??. Lol. EDIT: The only thing your Longer hunting season would accomplish , is to enable the Estate to hold 'More large scale shoots offs' - duh - you didn't really think that out did you - that is one of the many reasons i said your comment was moot and a non starter - it doesn't solve anything , it only allows for prolonged hunting operations for the Company using the Estate. How did you think that was going to change anything ??.

[–] 0 pt

Save you projection DS BS, they send me the Pee Wee Herman's. Genius how did you miss this being so highly intellect.

It is believed the animals on the shoot were not fenced in on the 37,000-hectare property which is teeming with wildlife including wild boar and stag.

next is what is happening to the meat, pictures show none of them have even been field dressed. More signs of you being a lousy hunter.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

LOlz, where does it actually say in the article that 'they were not fenced in on the 37 000 hectare property' ?/. The article clearly states the opposite. It's agi-prop reporting and you're still defending this piece of trash reporting.

Clearly the picture shows the carcasses were collected and placed there per regulations - Again You have no evidence to show that the animals were not butchered for the meat either. You are literally complaining bc you want photos of them dressing the meat. As with all for profit businesses, ie, the Estate and other than diseased or contaminated animals - they on-sell the meat or have supply agreements with local butcheries for butchering, dressing , buying, selling. You seem entirely unfamiliar with large scale livestock Estate practices that hold on property hunts/ shoot-offs - go educate yourself first , you're sounding ridiculous. Just lol at your 'DS bs' insinuation, simply bc someone disagrees with you and points out you don't seem to know what the fck you're talking about here ...

[–] 0 pt

laugh all you want Pee Wee. they each got 7 animals on all that land, what did the animals do just stand there waiting for their turn to be shot. What a total dumbass you are. Congratulations you just made Pee Wee Herman look intelligent. ignore the facts while you blow smoke up your own ass about how intelligent you are, you are the only one stupid enough to believe yourself.