Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

If you're one of the few who will read this, you'll see that it combines our identity into a one-world system. You will see that the citizens of the countries embracing it have lost nearly all their rights. You will see that it will be tied to a cashless financial system. You will also see that it will destroy any hope we have restoring our government to the people if this is implemented - and it is very close to becoming a reality.

Why are NONE of the candidates talking about this? Why is NO ONE talking about this? If they truly cared about freedom, they would - because this will lock us into a system that we can't escape - and a system into which we are locking successive generations. Is THIS the legacy we want to leave for our children?

If you're one of the few who will read this, you'll see that it combines our identity into a one-world system. You will see that the citizens of the countries embracing it have lost nearly all their rights. You will see that it will be tied to a cashless financial system. You will also see that it will destroy any hope we have restoring our government to the people if this is implemented - and it is very close to becoming a reality. Why are NONE of the candidates talking about this? Why is NO ONE talking about this? If they truly cared about freedom, they would - because this will lock us into a system that we can't escape - and a system into which we are locking successive generations. Is THIS the legacy we want to leave for our children?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (8).
[–] • 1 pt

what I would consider even more insidious is the parallel push for very strict voter ID laws that most folks think seem like a reasonable idea. Let's do the Hegelian dialectic in reverse, the desired outcome" one world digital ID" How do we convince folks that having this ID system is needed? Flood the country with illegals, make it known that they are voting, have many criminals among them, maybe even some scary diseases. Surely that would be enough to convince even the most cynical that we need an international ID system. Of course it's the solution( the predetermined one) Years ago( 20) I believe Clinton signed an I'D bill, and I know most of us then researchers were up in arms about having to show an ID for even traffic stops. Back then it was illegal to use ones SS# as an identifier. The SS card even said that at the bottom" Not legal for use as identification",which it does not say any longer. My point is the change of attitudes about our most personal information, a paradigm shift being fueled on both sides by the same globalist that bring you totally undocumented illegals using them to " manufacture your consent" or Delphi you into signing onto the "one world order ID" Be careful what you wish for.

[–] • 2 pts

You are SO right, zom. In fact, Omidyar-puppet Braynard at Look Ahead America is suggesting using thumbprints on ballots for the EXACT reason you say.

One of the things that POs me so much about the voter ID, is it's not that hard - show your damn driver's license or state-issued ID - that's sufficient. Right now, most states are doing NOTHING.

Ironic, too, that Omidyar - who funds numerous groups opposing voter ID - is a key force behind digital ID - so that just goes to show you what shams these people are.