to counter the truth they know is coming.
Not relevant. Whats relevant is 1. public reaction, 2. what powers will enforce the law.
I argue the public reaction will sooner or later be significant, but that this is probably not gonna make a serious change if there are no political powers to enforce the law.
The law is broken, there is no law.
> to counter the truth they know is coming.
Not relevant. Whats relevant is 1. public reaction, 2. what powers will enforce the law.
I argue the public reaction will sooner or later be significant, but that this is probably not gonna make a serious change if there are no political powers to enforce the law.
The law is broken, there is no law.
(post is archived)