Based on the FOIA request, it looks like FB isn't the main target - it looks like the ONLY target: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/790066/response/1894179/attach/3/65966%20Andrew%20Poelstra%20final%20response.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1
Brother, apply it to all Governments only so we the people can keep track, watch how fast they drop this crap.
https://mcsaatchi.com/global-social-issues
Partnering with governments, civil society, foundations, academia and the private sector, we work on the critical issues of our time, including the climate emergency, national security, human rights and freedoms, social justice, conflict prevention, and the Sustainable Development Goals.
So that tells us the gist of what we need to know about Saatchi. Not good
But this situation is more complicated that what it appears. The article wants us to believe that there are two factions "at war" - encryption vs. no encryption. They know people who value privacy will go for the non-encryption. The truth is, the same people are behind both sides of the argument - a strategy that they've played out time and time again bc it's so successful, e.g. the uni-party. And like the uniparty, they've set up this encryption issue as a win-win situation - for them.
I want to check a few things before I add to more to this, but I wanted to put a "heads up" here now while this post is fresh.
(post is archived)