Or simply don’t take the clot shots (calling it a vaccine legitimizes it)
Or simply don’t take the clot shots (calling it a vaccine legitimizes it)
Hourly ejaculations using an electromagnet attached to scrotum?
Hourly ejaculations using an electromagnet attached to scrotum?
These fucking idiots. GRAPHENE IS NOT MAGNETIC. Goddamned morons.
These fucking idiots. GRAPHENE IS NOT MAGNETIC. Goddamned morons.
Your not as smart as you think you are
Your not as smart as you think you are
[Hydrogen makes graphene magnetic](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmPAAo7_xY0)
[How to induce magnetism in graphene](https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/12/191210111639.htm)
This is a great point, I did not know this was possible. Thanks for the clarification.
Here is some important context from your second link: "However, one property has so far been elusive: magnetism. "
Here is another link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780081021545000059#:~:text=Graphene%20is%20intrinsically%20nonmagnetic%20as,electrons%20and%20generate%20net%20spins.
Context: "In the past decade, such theoretical predictions have been verified by two persuasive experimental results: (1) introducing point defects can undoubtedly and effectively induce the magnetic moments in graphene, and (2) the spins distributed at the different sites on the graphene basal plane can couple (anti)ferromagnetically to form spin clusters. Although the precise control of the distribution of abundant spins in graphene is still tremendously challenging, the spintronics application of graphene-based materials is promising."
Or, in other words, graphene is still not naturally magnetic.
Thanks for the heads up on that.
This is a great point, I did not know this was possible. Thanks for the clarification.
Here is some important context from your second link: "However, one property has so far been elusive: magnetism. "
Here is another link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780081021545000059#:~:text=Graphene%20is%20intrinsically%20nonmagnetic%20as,electrons%20and%20generate%20net%20spins.
Context: "In the past decade, such theoretical predictions have been verified by two persuasive experimental results: (1) introducing point defects can undoubtedly and effectively induce the magnetic moments in graphene, and (2) the spins distributed at the different sites on the graphene basal plane can couple (anti)ferromagnetically to form spin clusters. Although the precise control of the distribution of abundant spins in graphene is still tremendously challenging, the spintronics application of graphene-based materials is promising."
Or, in other words, graphene is still not naturally magnetic.
Thanks for the heads up on that.
These sorts of posts are potentially more dangerous than not, because someone might then get jabbed under the assumption that a handful of vitamins afterwards will nullify it. This video, like others, makes a bunch of claims but that's not the same as proof. I'm a big fan of NAC and Zinc for all sorts of reasons but they aren't fairy dust and I'd be foolish to assume they will remove graphene oxide without seeing the results of quality studies first.
Besides there are at least 2 vaccines that are not based on MNRA. One has even been approved in the US https://www.oann.com/texas-scientists-roll-out-patent-free-covid-19-vaccine-protein-based-corbevax-has-no-mrna/
Or you could, you know, just not fall for the MSN fear mongering over a moderately severe cold.
These sorts of posts are potentially more dangerous than not, because someone might then get jabbed under the assumption that a handful of vitamins afterwards will nullify it. This video, like others, makes a bunch of claims but that's not the same as proof. I'm a big fan of NAC and Zinc for all sorts of reasons but they aren't fairy dust and I'd be foolish to assume they will remove graphene oxide without seeing the results of quality studies first.
Besides there are at least 2 vaccines that are not based on MNRA. One has even been approved in the US https://www.oann.com/texas-scientists-roll-out-patent-free-covid-19-vaccine-protein-based-corbevax-has-no-mrna/
Or you could, you know, just not fall for the MSN fear mongering over a moderately severe cold.
While I generally agree with you,, there are a lot of people who took it against their better judgement because they have a family to support as well as others who took it because they trusted the source (or for many other reasons) who now have buyer's remorse (regret) having taken it. There needs to be serious discussion and research to determine if there is anyway to at least start to counter effects and/or remove it from the body. Currently it seems the belief is that it can't be removed which I agree with but what do I know? nothing
anyways, that was the point of this post maybe this works, maybe it don't but it's a start.
While I generally agree with you,,
there are a lot of people who took it against their better judgement because they have a family to support as well as others who took it because they trusted the source (or for many other reasons) who now have buyer's remorse (regret) having taken it.
There needs to be serious discussion and research to determine if there is anyway to at least start to counter effects and/or remove it from the body.
Currently it seems the belief is that it can't be removed which I agree with but what do I know? nothing
anyways, that was the point of this post
maybe this works, maybe it don't but it's a start.
'The new treatment is based off protein-based technology that has been used in other vaccines for decades and it does not use MRNA.'
So is it, by FDA definition, a Gene therapy ?? . Is there a quick tl:dr on the mechanism of action for this 'protein-based technology' ??.
EDit. Oh had a quick look , appears to be an actual traditional vaccine, however where did they get the initial viral culture from - an actual infected person or is it more ' from the uploaded spike protein genome'. Would have to know lots more about it, before even considering to 'recommend' it , lol.
> 'The new treatment is based off protein-based technology that has been used in other vaccines for decades and it does not use MRNA.'
So is it, by FDA definition, a Gene therapy ?? .
Is there a quick tl:dr on the mechanism of action for this 'protein-based technology' ??.
EDit. Oh had a quick look , appears to be an actual traditional vaccine, however where did they get the initial viral culture from - an actual infected person or is it more ' from the uploaded spike protein genome'.
Would have to know lots more about it, before even considering to 'recommend' it , lol.
Here's the other one that I know of https://www.novavax.com I'm not sure what "proprietary recombinant nanoparticle vaccine technology" is but it isn't MRNA. It doesn't appear to be in clinical trials in North America so I'm not holding my breath.
Here's the other one that I know of https://www.novavax.com I'm not sure what "proprietary recombinant nanoparticle vaccine technology" is but it isn't MRNA. It doesn't appear to be in clinical trials in North America so I'm not holding my breath.
Yeah, first time i heard about novavax it was touted as a traditional vaccine, i thought cool - finally a normal vaccine for those not wanting the experimental gene therapy , then when i did look into and mechanism for operation, i was like 'WTF this ain't no traditional vacc'. Anything using recombinant nanoparticle vaccine technology is a hard pass for me personally. Same as the two covid jabs using the adenovirus vector (of a m-RNA spike protein) J&j / AstraZeneca. Basically all the ones on offer are just differing various renditions on the spike protein (uploaded from a computer algorithm simulation ) All are a class of Gene therapy and Gene editing ...
Yeah, first time i heard about novavax it was touted as a traditional vaccine, i thought cool - finally a normal vaccine for those not wanting the experimental gene therapy , then when i did look into and mechanism for operation, i was like 'WTF this ain't no traditional vacc'.
Anything using recombinant nanoparticle vaccine technology is a hard pass for me personally. Same as the two covid jabs using the adenovirus vector (of a m-RNA spike protein) J&j / AstraZeneca. Basically all the ones on offer are just differing various renditions on the spike protein (uploaded from a computer algorithm simulation ) All are a class of Gene therapy and Gene editing ...
(post is archived)