*Novak Djokovic hands The Australian Government their asses
*Novak Djokovic hands The Australian Government their asses
2668 11-Jan-2019 12:19 AM PST Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 8ch/qresearch 4707080
BOOM! BOOM! BOOM! BOOM! Q
- Fauci (exposed again at Senate hearing)
- Prince Andrew (to be tried in civil court)
- Ray Epps (comes into question at Senate hearing)
- Project Veritas bombshell (evidence of premeditated manslaughter of millions)
>2668
>11-Jan-2019 12:19 AM PST
>Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
>8ch/qresearch 4707080
>BOOM!
> BOOM!
> BOOM!
> BOOM!
>Q
- Fauci (exposed again at Senate hearing)
- Prince Andrew (to be tried in civil court)
- Ray Epps (comes into question at Senate hearing)
- Project Veritas bombshell (evidence of premeditated manslaughter of millions)
they knew in 2019 that they would be calling Epps into question at a hearing in 2022.
No, Trump knew their playbook back in 2019, including the planned theft of the 2020 elections and the strategy of staging an insurrection to divert attention onto him as a disgruntled loser. The staged insurrection was monitored, data collected, and it's release timed to fit a timeline for exposure. It didn't have to be at a Senate hearing, but the situation fit the occasion to align it with Q's post.
Same with other events.
Q's posts aren't predictions. They're markers. How those markers might be used was intended to be flexible. But they're based on a projected timeline. Many of the 2019 posts line up with what's going on 3 years later.
I suggest you leave the group if you aren't part of the team.
>they knew in 2019 that they would be calling Epps into question at a hearing in 2022.
No, Trump knew their playbook back in 2019, including the planned theft of the 2020 elections and the strategy of staging an insurrection to divert attention onto him as a disgruntled loser. The staged insurrection was monitored, data collected, and it's release timed to fit a timeline for exposure. It didn't have to be at a Senate hearing, but the situation fit the occasion to align it with Q's post.
Same with other events.
Q's posts aren't predictions. They're markers. How those markers might be used was intended to be flexible. But they're based on a projected timeline. Many of the 2019 posts line up with what's going on 3 years later.
I suggest you leave the group if you aren't part of the team.
Q's posts aren't predictions. They're markers. How those markers might be used was intended to be flexible. But they're based on a projected timeline.
one could replace time line with red lines i.e.. events. but SPOT on. They are markers. And when anyone notices a marker the shills come out in spades...
and Qisafraud has been on here a long time..we have all called " it " out multiple times... he is paid opposition.
And thanQ again for posting this delta.. It is super important, and should have a sticky
Q's posts aren't predictions. They're markers. How those markers might be used was intended to be flexible. But they're based on a projected timeline.
one could replace time line with red lines i.e.. events. but SPOT on. They are markers. And when anyone notices a marker the shills come out in spades...
and Qisafraud has been on here a long time..we have all called " it " out multiple times... he is paid opposition.
And thanQ again for posting this delta.. It is super important, and should have a sticky
Well said. Yes. Markers. That and seeding out clues and data for us to peruse. To wake us up to information warfare. At least those who were not aware of it yet. Hee hee. I had to dust off a few things from research i did decades past. Future proves past without a doubt. Time will certainly tell in any case. We will likely live to see the result. Will we survive it? Time will tell. ; )
Well said. Yes.
Markers.
That and seeding out clues and data for us to peruse.
To wake us up to information warfare. At least those who were not aware of it yet.
Hee hee.
I had to dust off a few things from research i did decades past.
Future proves past without a doubt.
Time will certainly tell in any case.
We will likely live to see the result.
Will we survive it?
Time will tell.
; )
Those who are awake and play it smart will survive it.
Future generations will be free to learn the mistakes of the past and understand what happened so it doesn't happen again.
We're at the end of a cosmic cycle. Transcendence of the human spirit to a new level of existence is coming, once this evil is eradicated from our midst.
Those who are awake and play it smart will survive it.
Future generations will be free to learn the mistakes of the past and understand what happened so it doesn't happen again.
We're at the end of a cosmic cycle. Transcendence of the human spirit to a new level of existence is coming, once this evil is eradicated from our midst.
I'm just curious and just trying to understand. Your name is "QisAFraud" and you are here posting your thoughts, which is fine...free speech! I'm just curious though, why are you here? Are you mad about the Q thing? Why come to a Q discussion board? Especially if QisAFraud?
I'm just curious and just trying to understand. Your name is "QisAFraud" and you are here posting your thoughts, which is fine...free speech! I'm just curious though, why are you here? Are you mad about the Q thing? Why come to a Q discussion board? Especially if QisAFraud?
Eh. I chose the name in haste. I actually like the Q people and want them to be right - and can be persuaded to think they are. Maybe someday, depending on what happens. I think Durham is showing that maybe this is all real.
But their own confirmation bias and tunnel vision and paranoid schizophrenia makes me doubt the whole thing.
It’s funny that they shit on me, I was probably one of the very first people on board with Q. But I saw the lies, I saw the misdirections, I saw the reaching and grasping for coincidences to be proof, and I started to realize that I needed more than stretches and bending logic into a pretzel to continue to believe.
I mean, we are talking about a community that takes major, major, major setbacks and reconfigured their predictions and history to try to make it look like it’s actually a secret win. What more do you need to say?
I tried to hold them to the things they themselves said, they lied and backtracked and tried to pretend they never said the things they said. What does that tell you about any community that does that?
Eh. I chose the name in haste. I actually like the Q people and want them to be right - and can be persuaded to think they are. Maybe someday, depending on what happens. I think Durham is showing that maybe this is all real.
But their own confirmation bias and tunnel vision and paranoid schizophrenia makes me doubt the whole thing.
It’s funny that they shit on me, I was probably one of the very first people on board with Q. But I saw the lies, I saw the misdirections, I saw the reaching and grasping for coincidences to be proof, and I started to realize that I needed more than stretches and bending logic into a pretzel to continue to believe.
I mean, we are talking about a community that takes major, major, major setbacks and reconfigured their predictions and history to try to make it look like it’s actually a secret win. What more do you need to say?
I tried to hold them to the things they themselves said, they lied and backtracked and tried to pretend they never said the things they said. What does that tell you about any community that does that?
Understood. Thanks for the reply. I actually agree with some of the points you stated and also get tired of the constant moving of the goal posts. I hope I live to see justice done. Take care.
Understood. Thanks for the reply. I actually agree with some of the points you stated and also get tired of the constant moving of the goal posts. I hope I live to see justice done. Take care.
nice catch Moderator. ThanQ for finding it. yea id say we are at a 3 year delta
nice catch Moderator. ThanQ for finding it.
yea id say we are at a 3 year delta
(post is archived)