Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Apparently a juror did not disclose that he was sexually abused as a child and was active in persuading other jurors toward a guilty verdict. After the trial, the juror gave several interviews in which he described his own sexual abuse.

There is another post on here https://poal.co/s/QStorm/490031 about a tainted juror working for Carlyle. This article indicates it is the same juror (and it's interesting that Yahoo is publishing it.) https://news.yahoo.com/ghislaine-maxwell-juror-could-upend-220757450.html

The attorney in the video, a former prosecutor who does a great job reviewing these cases, seems to believe that this very well could end up a mistrial and is not happy about it.

Related: https://nypost.com/2022/01/06/juror-in-ghislaine-maxwell-mistrial-scandal-retains-anna-sorokins-lawyer/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10375475/Will-rogue-juror-set-Ghislaine-Maxwell-free-Conviction-chaos-juror-lawyered-up.html

Apparently a juror did not disclose that he was sexually abused as a child and was active in persuading other jurors toward a guilty verdict. After the trial, the juror gave several interviews in which he described his own sexual abuse. There is another post on here https://poal.co/s/QStorm/490031 about a tainted juror working for Carlyle. This article indicates it is the same juror (and it's interesting that Yahoo is publishing it.) https://news.yahoo.com/ghislaine-maxwell-juror-could-upend-220757450.html The attorney in the video, a former prosecutor who does a great job reviewing these cases, seems to believe that this very well could end up a mistrial and is not happy about it. Related: https://nypost.com/2022/01/06/juror-in-ghislaine-maxwell-mistrial-scandal-retains-anna-sorokins-lawyer/ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10375475/Will-rogue-juror-set-Ghislaine-Maxwell-free-Conviction-chaos-juror-lawyered-up.html

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (4).
[–] • 0 pt

I understand her argument that, if they wanted to sway the trial, the current circumstance only allows a mistrial not an acquittal.

Like she said, if the juror was trying to rig the outcome, he could have just pushed a 'not guilty' vote. I don't think there was any intentional rigging.

At the same time, we know that it's harder to get convictions after mistrials

All of what came out at the first trial would still stand against GM. This juror problem just delays the inevitable and forces the victims to go through this all over again.

[–] • 0 pt

All of what came out at the first trial would still stand against GM. This juror problem just delays the inevitable and forces the victims to go through this all over again.

Agree - the victims will be re-victimized. They will get raked over the coals on cross-exam with their prior testimony.