I think your concern is valid and in its current form the bill has impressively sloppy language. It provides no due process in terms of reviewing the parent's request or at least putting it to a vote of the community. It looks like it was either thrown together quickly to get a foot in the door (and worry about amendments later), or just another attention-whoring stunt bill like .
I think your concern is valid and in its current form the bill has impressively sloppy language. It provides no due process in terms of reviewing the parent's request or at least putting it to a vote of the community. It looks like it was either thrown together quickly to get a foot in the door (and worry about amendments later), or just another attention-whoring stunt bill like [the one from a weirdo in Pennsylvania to require vasectomies](https://www.newsweek.com/democratic-pennsylvania-state-rep-proposes-requiring-vasectomies-age-40-1635925).
another attention-whoring stunt bill like the one from a weirdo in Pennsylvania to require vasectomies.
That definitely crossed my mind.
>another attention-whoring stunt bill like the one from a weirdo in Pennsylvania to require vasectomies.
That definitely crossed my mind.
(post is archived)