I hear what you are saying on the slippery slope. However, the article was pretty clear that it was books that had anything to do with sex. I can get behind that bill. On the slippery slope, if in the future some retards wanted to ban something outside of sex relations, they would have to put it up for a vote likely through legislation. The everyday normal folk would shut it down. The everyday normal folk pretty much universally agree that they don't want government institutions teaching their kids about sex.

I think your concern is valid and in its current form the bill has impressively sloppy language. It provides no due process in terms of reviewing the parent's request or at least putting it to a vote of the community. It looks like it was either thrown together quickly to get a foot in the door (and worry about amendments later), or just another attention-whoring stunt bill like .

Well they continue to say these books do not exist and it's a conspiracy perhaps once they are pulled off the shelf and shown to the administration they definitely should remove it.

Clearly a case of the pendulum swinging too far the other way. We should be burning the offensive administrators in the parking lot, not the books. all seriousness aside, we've seen these laws to sideways too often.