If I was one of the jabbed, I'd be furious over this news. Of course, most of them will never see it bc the MSM will never show it.
I think the opposite will actually happen.
They'll show it on mainstream news eventually, specifically to upset the jabbed.
Once angry, the junta's propaganda can redirect that anger, irrationally, and arbitrarily, against the unjabbed, to push for mandatory jabs.
"well if we got it, they should have to get it too! Its not fair! You should have to pay your fair share too! Health equality now! Healthcare equity now!"
Without missing a beat or noticing they're angry because they got duped, possibly injured, are blatantly denying the jabs are dangerous, and simultaneously calling for the injury/death of those of us who are unjabbed.
Without missing a beat, they'll advocate for "health equity/equality", meaning "we got injured, they should also have to suffer/be maimed/risk death too."
Thats what the argument will be. Complete irrationality. Complete vitriol.
They'll show it on mainstream news eventually, specifically to upset the jabbed.
Once angry, the junta's propaganda can redirect that anger, irrationally, and arbitrarily, against the unjabbed, to push for mandatory jabs.
"well if we got it, they should have to get it too! Its not fair! You should have to pay your fair share to! Health equality now! Healthcare equity now!"
Without missing a beat or noticing they're angry because they got duped, possibly injured, are blatantly denying the jabs are dangerous, and simultaneously calling for the injury/death of those of us who are unjabbed.
Yes, I can see a scenario like this happening - in ways it already is happening, with them blaming the unjabbed for spreading the new variants.
Yes, I can see a scenario like this happening - in ways it already is happening, with them blaming the unjabbe
Exactly.
Maybe my cynicism is born of myopia though. The gambit is usually look-at-what-you-see-now-and-just-doubledown-on-it.
We can always expect surprises in the narrative though, a flourish, a distraction, the (occasional) pivot.
But always, always "how could it be worse?"
Because it can always be worse.
You can take that as cynical, or as a certain kind of hopefulness I guess.
Because it can always be worse.
You can take that as cynical, or as a certain kind of hopefulness I guess.
I hope you're not hopeful that things will get worse ;-)
(post is archived)