![Only two camps.. those who know these children are alive, and those pretending they are not. 'Abortion' is just a euphemism for murder! No child is too young to protect. ....... [580x827 - 266KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/Brb8EO.png){kind=link}
See, that's the problem. According to OP, niggers are the same as Whites. This is contrary to empirical evidence (see 2020, Derrell Brooks) and to believe such (Whites and niggers are the same), you have to swallow the juden's word games. It's amazing to me how quickly certain things fall apart when reality is introduced.
All the busy bodies that want to end abortion want is to force people to believe what they believe and how they believe it. They can't be bothered to focus only on their own, they feel it is their moral obligation to ensure everybody follows their religious beliefs.
observe the NPC flair on OPs name.
Is that what it is? I mean, it makes sense, I just can't tell with my current glasses.
Should we have laws against rape? What if someone didn't think rape was wrong? Would you be concerned I was forcing my religion on them because my religion, where I get my moral code from, says that rape is wrong?
Depends on your religion. Does your god demand it's genitals to be mutilated?
If we didn't wipe out the Aztec Empire, we'd have people demand child sacrifices in the name of their religion. That would make the Abortion debate even more complicated.
That said, I agree. We have to force moral standards on others. It's the fundament of law and culture. I just wanted to point out that some religions are utterly fucked in the head and already get away with too much.
Assuming you are talking about circumcision, no. Just like animal sacrifice, or dietary restrictions, certain ancient traditions are not applicable today.
And yea, I would like my society to follow laws that are founded in my religion where those that disobey face punishment. But I'm only talking about certain basic tenets like thou shalt not do murder and thou shalt not steal. I cant imagine a successful society that doesnt accept these concepts. Dont violate an individual's God given rights is the extent I want my religion pushed on anyone.
Should we have laws against rape?
Yes, because most people think rape is wrong and that goes across religions.
What if someone didn't think rape was wrong?
There's plenty of those people too, we tend to call them niggers and kikes. We used to punish them with death, but we stopped somewhere along the way and I suspect there's a nigger and kike getting away with rape right now because "racism and oppression."
Would you be concerned I was forcing my religion on them because my religion, where I get my moral code from, says that rape is wrong?
No, but if you are wanting to end abortion because you consider it murder, can we go after the anti-abortionists in 15 years when rape, murder, theft and general niggerness increases? I consider abortion murder. However, when I look at the stats, it is clearly a crime prevention measure.
We used to punish them with death, but we stopped somewhere along the way..
I agree with this entirely. There is no possible restitution for certain crimes, namely rape and murder. The only just punishment is death. But we have become soft on heinous crimes and our society suffers for it.
I consider abortion murder. However, when I look at the stats, it is clearly a crime prevention measure.
If rape should be illegal, murder should be as well. You said rape should be illegal because most people would agree it is wrong. The problem with this morality by popularity standard, or the "crime prevention measure" tactic is this- The retards are being told constantly that whiteness is bad and we need to erase it. Its just a matter of time before they are told that killing us will make the world better. We need to return to a strict standard of individual rights and individuals being judged individually for their own actions. It doesnt end well otherwise.
Related- I would bet that you disagree with the current societal morality more and more, as I do. Aren't we appealing to an objective morality that transcends culture and time when we do this? I dont know how I would wrap my head around that without my foundational religious beliefs. Thanks for responding.
(post is archived)