WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.5K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

The vehicles and appliances of 2050 will likely be more efficient than those of today, but precisely because of their greater efficiency there will be many more of them.

They weren't planning on there being very many people left on the planet who could take part in 'normal' society by 2050.

They might even have a few suppressed technologies they were planning to bring out to help them build and run their utopia.

Centuries of searching for chemically compatible materials for a battery that can store significant energy, charge quickly, sustain many charge-discharge cycles, and do so safely and reliably have yielded batteries capable of powering appliances but still not well suited to powering vehicles or electric grids.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XF_7oWtWPA

[–] 0 pt

If they really cared for the environment they’d go with nuclear all the way but they’re just jew shills that want to destroy the country with infective solar and wind.

[–] 0 pt

Basically, there is only solar energy that is "renewable". All other forms of renewable energy are derivatives of solar. For example: hydro-electric works by the sun evaporating water and later condensing it down to a mountain stream of some sort. Wind power is driven by the sun heating the planet unevenly, thus causing rushes of wind.

Batteries are inherently dirty, polluting, heavy and expensive. Lots of batteries are required to store the ephemeral solar energy and make it usable.