Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.0K

Numerous lawsuits have been filed against the Biden administration over vaccine mandates for private employers and federal contractors that are set to be published in the federal register on Friday.

The attorneys general of Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee announced they would take legal action against the White House over the rule and filed a lawsuit (pdf) in a bid to challenge President Joe Biden’s rule affecting federal contractors.

The Biden administration unveiled details of its federal COVID-19 mandate on Thursday, providing a Jan. 4, 2022 deadline for federal contractors and health care employees who work at Medicare- and Medicaid-funded facilities. At the same time, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued a rule requiring businesses with 100 or more employees to make sure all workers are vaccinated or submit to weekly testing, affecting tens of millions of workers.

“Unless we intervene, federal contractors in Tennessee will be forced to make sense of the mandate’s many inconsistencies that require their entire workforce be vaccinated or face potential blacklisting and loss of future federal contracts,” Tennessee Attorney General Herbert H. Slatery III said in a statement.

And Kentucky Attorney Daniel Cameron said that he takes “the issue of federal overreach seriously.” Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost joined the lawsuit, saying that “the Biden administration may not do whatever it wants, however it wants.”

“The Constitution lays out critical rules by which the executive branch must operate,” he said. “Congress and the states have their own powers, which the administration can’t just take over because it wants to.”

Numerous lawsuits have been filed against the Biden administration over vaccine mandates for private employers and federal contractors that are set to be published in the federal register on Friday. The attorneys general of Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee announced they would take legal action against the White House over the rule and filed a lawsuit (pdf) in a bid to challenge President Joe Biden’s rule affecting federal contractors. The Biden administration unveiled details of its federal COVID-19 mandate on Thursday, providing a Jan. 4, 2022 deadline for federal contractors and health care employees who work at Medicare- and Medicaid-funded facilities. At the same time, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued a rule requiring businesses with 100 or more employees to make sure all workers are vaccinated or submit to weekly testing, affecting tens of millions of workers. “Unless we intervene, federal contractors in Tennessee will be forced to make sense of the mandate’s many inconsistencies that require their entire workforce be vaccinated or face potential blacklisting and loss of future federal contracts,” Tennessee Attorney General Herbert H. Slatery III said in a statement. And Kentucky Attorney Daniel Cameron said that he takes “the issue of federal overreach seriously.” Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost joined the lawsuit, saying that “the Biden administration may not do whatever it wants, however it wants.” “The Constitution lays out critical rules by which the executive branch must operate,” he said. “Congress and the states have their own powers, which the administration can’t just take over because it wants to.”

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (10).
[–] • 1 pt

If vaccinated employees united with unvaccinated employees against these mandates, this atrocious tyranny could end in a day.

I think many of them would because: 1. They will also be considered unvaxxed if they refuse a booster, which they may want to do to avoid more adverse reactions. 2. They were lied to about not needing masks if they are double vaxxed. 3. They were lied to about not being able to be infected with covid, or to spread it, if they are double vaxxed. The definitions kept changing. 4. They know many people are having blood clots, neurological damage, immune issues, and heart inflammation, and so they don't want the covid jab to be mandated. They care for others enough to allow individual choice and understand our Constitutional rights. 5. They don't want to be handed huge additional work loads left by all the unvaccinated who are fired.

Let's pass the word to unite. If the majority will, then these mandates will end immediately.

[–] • 1 pt

Not to be a downer but if people are asleep to what the government has become in the last 30 years there is no uniting with them. What does light and dark have in common?

[–] • 1 pt

True. Sad.

There are some of the jabbed who are angry about being deceived or harmed. At least some of them have switched sides.

My son and daughter-in-law came out of college very brainwashed. They both got jabbed twice. My daughter-in-law had minor heart damage from her second jab, so she is refusing the boosters. So is my son. Finally! They looked into the ingredients. Now they distrust.

Others are angry because they are still forced into wearing masks. If they are personally affected, they seen to wake up more easily.

When jab damage to kids becomes more obvious, just watch the parents resist with a fury, even if they are liberal.

So sad that it is coming to this.

I am hoping the upcoming Senate vote about mandates will disallow mandates in the future. If not, those of us who are unjabbed will probably lose our medical and our social security next. Then all other means to stay alive.