WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

We have had threads on this not being safe in the past. They are just now reporting this ? So much for following the Jab closely as they claim.

We have had threads on this not being safe in the past. They are just now reporting this ? So much for following the Jab closely as they claim.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

I don't disagree with the vaccine being unsafe, but I do not find the New England Journal of Medicine admitting anything. They are making a correction to their report and stating these spontaneous abortions are within range. (crazy)

You’re absolutely correct. They are merely updating language that they used previously, the headline and the article are extremely misleading but what else do we expect from Gateway Pundit? They are awful.

Furthermore, the numbers in the study indicate absolutely no additional risk in the population, in this case vaxxed pregnant women, OVER EXPECTED NUMBERS IN THE GENERAL POPULATION.

Depending on what source you go to, almost 1/4 of pregnancies terminate early either through miscarriage, spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, etc. These numbers are actually LOWER than the general population of expectant mothers!!

If anything, if this data is to be believed, you are LESS likely to have a stillbirth or spontaneous abortion if you had the vaccine. How the hell does Gateway Pundit continue to get crucial information wrong over and over and over again and people continue to post them here?

This is outrageously misleading.

And now if you look at Twitter, thousands of people are sharing this article and each and everyone of them looks like a stone cold fucking retard for sharing this in the way that they are and showing the entire world just how ignorant and stupid they are.

The data literally shows the opposite of what gateway pundit very clear implication is.

If people against this vaccine are so obsessed with convincing others that they are right, they need to stop making mistakes like this. It’s so goddamn embarrassing. I see this over and over and over again, anti-VAXers who have absolutely no idea what they are looking at, what they are reading, or what they were talking about. You people are literally convincing people to get the vaccine because the people who are against it look like fucking retards.

I mean if we are the ones obsessed with “waking up normies” you can’t get this wrong. Nonetheless get it wrong on a daily basis.

[–] 0 pt

Most news articles are actually re-written from another source, and Gateway Pundit is notorious for reporting on an already written article. It is sensationalism at its best but I am stunned by people's lack of following through on an article stated to have an original source. People need to question Gateway Pundit and their motives. Not everyone proclaiming to be in support of the "cause" actually is and this article is a perfect example.

Agree, the information must be correct to make an effort in changing anyone's mind. Unless the intent was to make the group look stupid...

[–] 1 pt

They are basically saying, we don't have the data yet so we are making shit up.

[–] 1 pt

sorry we murdered your baby

The number of miscarriages and still births in this study are well below that of the general population. Can you read?

I mean I thought you people are super Internet super spy secret detectives. But you don’t even read the things that are posted here. The numbers in this study literally indicate a lower mortality rate of pregnancies among vaccinated women than the general population. It’s the exact opposite of what you people think this is. Gateway pundit is either lying or stupid.

But you super agent secret super detectives apparently just believe whatever GP tells you without even reading what they are offering.

Again, the rate of spontaneous abortions stillbirth, etc. in this study among vaccinated women is LOWER than the general population of pregnant women. Lower. Do you understand that? Significantly lower. By several percentage points.

Yeah you people are outraged that the media thinks you are conspiracy theorists or ignorant about science.

STOP PROVING THEM RIGHT.

[–] 0 pt

... or non-pregnant women or people in general.

[–] 0 pt

Without knowing what the normal rate is the data is meaningless. They then state "within range", how many sigma is "within range"? was it high or low?

Also, all the (((rulers))) force on us is "withing 28 days of a positive test". Where is the data for miscarriages, heart issues, and deaths within 28 days of a shot? The test isn't even a good one, but we sure do know the exact times they got the shots. I will put out there that if the data showed nothing wrong then they would be showing it, they aren't.

Then you need to read it again. Holy crap I can’t believe the ignorance around here. Look, I’m on your side, this vaccine is dangerous, but this study indicates the exact opposite. Is the data made up? Maybe.

And we absolutely do know what the “normal rate“ is. We absolutely do. You need to look at the time frame of the study again, do a little research on what the normal rate is, if you want to call it “normal rate“, and you will quickly see what I’m talking about.

The language of the presentation of the study was slightly altered for legalistic reasons, the data did not change. And the data very much goes against the narrative that these vaccines are dangerous for pregnant women and their babies.

[–] 0 pt

I was ranting about the GP not presenting it. But honestly i looked for it in the papers linked by them and didn't see it either. I guess your merchant was well earned.