Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

683

The FDA was too hasty in giving full approval of the COVID vaccine, as some of the data relating to possible side effects won't be available for FDA review for years.

FDA APPROVAL requires Pfizer to submit study results analyzing risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, and risk to long-term infant development in pregnant women to the FDA for review on Oct 31, 2025 and May 31, 2027 respectively. WTF!!!!!!!!

One remembers past problematic drugs that had been given FDA approval: Risperdal (antipsychotic that makes men grow breasts) Cerivastatin (caused 100,000+ wrongful deaths) benzodiazepines (responsible for 35% of drug-related hospital stays) Dsuvia (opioid 10 times more powerful than fentanyl)

The FDA was too hasty in giving full approval of the COVID vaccine, as some of the data relating to possible side effects won't be available for FDA review for years. FDA APPROVAL requires Pfizer to submit study results analyzing risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, and risk to long-term infant development in pregnant women to the FDA for review on Oct 31, 2025 and May 31, 2027 respectively. WTF!!!!!!!! One remembers past problematic drugs that had been given FDA approval: Risperdal (antipsychotic that makes men grow breasts) Cerivastatin (caused 100,000+ wrongful deaths) benzodiazepines (responsible for 35% of drug-related hospital stays) Dsuvia (opioid 10 times more powerful than fentanyl)

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

I heard a doctor today say that the shot gave him pericarditis and he had chest pain for weeks.

He still said that if someone he loved didn’t want to take the shot, he would wait until their back was turned and give it to them then.

Yes, a doctor joking about forced vaccination. He said that the “risk” is too high.

What’s the death rate of Covitz again? Like 0.017?

[–] • 0 pt

Society has decided to pretend via a mass delusion that old people should never die of respiratory disease. For these people, the choice is “guaranteed death from COVID” versus “chance of side effects from the shot.”

[–] • 0 pt

And not only should 'old people never of respiratory illness' but all other presumably healthy individuals (of all ages) should therefore willingly inject themselves with 'experimental gene therapy treatments' .... Delusion is off the charts .

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

>This human experiment has to stop!!

It's not an experiment. Call it what it is - global genocide.

[–] • 2 pts

It's not approved. Read the full document from the FDA https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download

[–] • 3 pts

It is approve. You read it!

[–] • 2 pts

It only approved an application. That does not equate to fully licensed. 13 pages and that one little line eluded to an application. The rest of that 13 pages it extended the EUA. Sorry but no its not approved

[–] • 2 pts

what does it matter if all the government say it approved and can be mandated and they don't correct the government on the truth.

[–] • 0 pt

The approval of the application means its approved.

[–] • 2 pts

True. However, I just found out that as of today, the FDA is prohibiting pharmacies in my midwest state to fill prescriptions for Ivermectin. Also, some online doctors have quit treating patients because of the new FDA rules and penalties. So, the FDA is doing everything they can to prevent therapeutic, wise, early treatment.

We had several local doctors who were treating covid properly and several pharmacies still filling prescriptions for HCQ and Ivermectin as of yesterday. Today, we do not. Timing?

Where are the lawsuits!!!!!

Also in a new development, the counties are now making it much more difficult to get religious exemptions. Does anyone have a link to legal assistance with religious exemptions?

[–] • 1 pt

As long as doctors are operating under the false assumption that “Covid” exists, they’re not treating it properly.

To treat it properly would be to decry it as a hoax.

[–] • 1 pt

I do agree that it was created on purpose, so the narrative is a hoax. But, I have a friend who died of it.

Then, I also agree that the pcr tests run at 40 cycles made their fear narrative about "cases" and "death" another hoax.

Then, manipulating the data of the Lancet Hydroxychloroquine study was a hoax. That study was retracted.

Then, the NIH study of Hydroxychloroquine used dangerous dosages, administered too late and without zinc. That study was also retracted, yet the banning of HCQ continued.

Preventing doctors from treating patients in the early stages and preventing pharmacies from filling prescriptions...all because they did not want us to know there is a therapeutic that works...is a criminal hoax, for sure.

Making us wear masks when they know darn well that masks do not prevent the spread of the virus was another hoax meant to stoke their fear narrative and break down our personal sovereignty.

Shutting down our economy and churches when there was a therapeutic cure the whole time is part of the hoax.

[–] • 1 pt

FDA is prohibiting pharmacies in my midwest state to fill prescriptions for Ivermectin

yo what the fuck

[–] • 2 pts

I can take a crap in a box and mark it guaranteed if it helps you sleep better at night

[–] • 1 pt

lmao, was there even an ounce of doubt that it would have been approved? How many trillions in damage would have been needed to compensate the population? Would the government even survive the backlash?

The fed used one hand to shake their other hand.

[–] • 0 pt

Why worry this is Donald Chump approved!