Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

863

Can you find this stuff over the counter yet at the pharmacy? How about Ivermectin? How many people die from these drugs and how many poeple are dying from the JAB?

The Lancet Medical Journal apologized this week and pulled the controversial hydroxychloroquine study.

The study released by Lancet titled — “Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis” — was retracted after it was found to be a complete fraud.

Reuters reported:

An influential study that found hydroxychloroquine increased the risk of death in COVID-19 patients has been withdrawn a week after it led to major trials being halted, adding to confusion about a malaria drug championed by U.S. President Donald Trump.

The Lancet medical journal pulled the study after three of its authors retracted it, citing concerns about the quality and veracity of data in it. The World Health Organization (WHO) will resume its hydroxychloroquine trials after pausing them in the wake of the study. Dozens of other trials have resumed or are in process.

The three authors said Surgisphere, the company that provided the data, would not transfer the dataset for an independent review and they “can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources.”

The co-authors of this study are all linked to the pharmaceutical industry.

>Can you find this stuff over the counter yet at the pharmacy? How about Ivermectin? How many people die from these drugs and how many poeple are dying from the JAB? The Lancet Medical Journal apologized this week and pulled the controversial hydroxychloroquine study. The study released by Lancet titled — “Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis” — was retracted after it was found to be a complete fraud. Reuters reported: An influential study that found hydroxychloroquine increased the risk of death in COVID-19 patients has been withdrawn a week after it led to major trials being halted, adding to confusion about a malaria drug championed by U.S. President Donald Trump. The Lancet medical journal pulled the study after three of its authors retracted it, citing concerns about the quality and veracity of data in it. The World Health Organization (WHO) will resume its hydroxychloroquine trials after pausing them in the wake of the study. Dozens of other trials have resumed or are in process. The three authors said Surgisphere, the company that provided the data, would not transfer the dataset for an independent review and they “can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources.” The co-authors of this study are all linked to the pharmaceutical industry.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (22).
[–] • -1 pt

slightly misleading:

retraction https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31324-6/fulltext

if you can't do a peer review of the data then you shouldn't publish anything based on it, but then neither can you conclude much from a subset of that data like the gateway is trying to do here

Published:January 27, 2021 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanrhe/article/PIIS2665-9913(21)00030-8/fulltext

five randomised trials on hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis have been published; [...] All five trials have consistently shown no prophylactic benefit of hydroxychloroquine across varied contexts and dosing regimens.

30 April 2021 https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-hydroxychloroquine

WHO does not recommend hydroxychloroquine to prevent COVID-19. This recommendation is based on six trials with more than 6000 participants who did not have COVID-19 and received hydroxychloroquine. Using hydroxychloroquine for prevention had little or no effect on preventing illness, hospitalization or death from COVID-19

getting bored of refuting this stuff, stop posting tiktok tier articles

[–] • 0 pt

You're not refuting anything by posting articles from the WHO. Just more lies.

[–] • -1 pt

You're not refuting anything by posting articles from the WHO.

correct, I figure the people best placed to understand all this are people whose job it is to study viruses. The next time I want my car fixed I won't be taking it to the florist either.

If I wanted an ignorant low IQ opinion I'd just ask a random from the internet and hope I don't get a scientist instead

Just more lies.

five randomised trials, were they all lying? I mean, why not just let people die eh?

[–] • 0 pt

This is a great article to read to understand how every organization in the UN operates politically NOT scientifically. Understanding how politics and agenda's work is the first step in understanding the world around you.

How the UN’s climate change panel created a “scientific consensus” on global warming. https://medium.com/@ronanconnolly/how-the-uns-climate-change-panel-created-a-scientific-consensus-on-global-warming-a062f5f54ab2

[–] • 0 pt (edited )