WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

Can you find this stuff over the counter yet at the pharmacy? How about Ivermectin? How many people die from these drugs and how many poeple are dying from the JAB?

The Lancet Medical Journal apologized this week and pulled the controversial hydroxychloroquine study.

The study released by Lancet titled — “Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis” — was retracted after it was found to be a complete fraud.

Reuters reported:

An influential study that found hydroxychloroquine increased the risk of death in COVID-19 patients has been withdrawn a week after it led to major trials being halted, adding to confusion about a malaria drug championed by U.S. President Donald Trump.

The Lancet medical journal pulled the study after three of its authors retracted it, citing concerns about the quality and veracity of data in it. The World Health Organization (WHO) will resume its hydroxychloroquine trials after pausing them in the wake of the study. Dozens of other trials have resumed or are in process.

The three authors said Surgisphere, the company that provided the data, would not transfer the dataset for an independent review and they “can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources.”

The co-authors of this study are all linked to the pharmaceutical industry.

>Can you find this stuff over the counter yet at the pharmacy? How about Ivermectin? How many people die from these drugs and how many poeple are dying from the JAB? The Lancet Medical Journal apologized this week and pulled the controversial hydroxychloroquine study. The study released by Lancet titled — “Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis” — was retracted after it was found to be a complete fraud. Reuters reported: An influential study that found hydroxychloroquine increased the risk of death in COVID-19 patients has been withdrawn a week after it led to major trials being halted, adding to confusion about a malaria drug championed by U.S. President Donald Trump. The Lancet medical journal pulled the study after three of its authors retracted it, citing concerns about the quality and veracity of data in it. The World Health Organization (WHO) will resume its hydroxychloroquine trials after pausing them in the wake of the study. Dozens of other trials have resumed or are in process. The three authors said Surgisphere, the company that provided the data, would not transfer the dataset for an independent review and they “can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources.” The co-authors of this study are all linked to the pharmaceutical industry.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Brother, this appears to show us who calls the shots. pun intended.

[–] 0 pt

Let’s get to the part where they get executed by the military.

Enough with the previews, I already have my beverage and XL popcorn.

Bring it TF on!

[–] 1 pt

can you find any qualified pharma researchers not linked to the pharma industry? why would it be weird to have connections within ones own industry

[–] 1 pt

Yes it doesn’t exist other than the university setting. The same universities that have been totally infiltrated by the Chicomms

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I have Hydraulic powered Guillotines with conveyor belts for sale.

Remote control is another $100 feature.

The base models come in a satin black other options are patterns like: American flag pattern. The rebel flag pattern. And my favorite color plaid.

Our motto: A powerful revolution with style.

Voting not working? Your judicial system stuck on stupid? Well then try to vegomatic your bolshevik problem away, with our French styled, German engineered, American made "head chopper offer machine".

Hell you can do all of congress in an evening. It's super slick finish is easy to clean off ready fo the next batch of tyranny or trannys.

This machine can kill faster than Hillary clinton before election season or your money back.

[–] 0 pt

Alright, how many people died due to these people, and how are we going to administer the punishment?

[–] 0 pt

Let's say this is all 100% true.

I have had one big question this entire time.

The United States has more lawyers then any country on the planet

WHY THE FUCK ARE THEY NOT SUING THE HELL OUT OF EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING RELATED TO THE COVID1984 LIE

[–] 0 pt (edited )

This is a great red pill for everyone who screams "trust the science" and thinks that medical research and medical journals are free from political influence. There was study from the Cleveland Clinic that showed that people who had Covid . That is June 2021.

Conclusions: Individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination,

to say that "more research is needed" and

Cleveland Clinic recommends those who are eligible receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

[–] 0 pt

Excellent contribution. Than you for sharing.

[–] -1 pt

slightly misleading:

retraction https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31324-6/fulltext

if you can't do a peer review of the data then you shouldn't publish anything based on it, but then neither can you conclude much from a subset of that data like the gateway is trying to do here

Published:January 27, 2021 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanrhe/article/PIIS2665-9913(21)00030-8/fulltext

five randomised trials on hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis have been published; [...] All five trials have consistently shown no prophylactic benefit of hydroxychloroquine across varied contexts and dosing regimens.

30 April 2021 https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-hydroxychloroquine

WHO does not recommend hydroxychloroquine to prevent COVID-19. This recommendation is based on six trials with more than 6000 participants who did not have COVID-19 and received hydroxychloroquine. Using hydroxychloroquine for prevention had little or no effect on preventing illness, hospitalization or death from COVID-19

getting bored of refuting this stuff, stop posting tiktok tier articles

[–] 0 pt

You're not refuting anything by posting articles from the WHO. Just more lies.

[–] -1 pt

You're not refuting anything by posting articles from the WHO.

correct, I figure the people best placed to understand all this are people whose job it is to study viruses. The next time I want my car fixed I won't be taking it to the florist either.

If I wanted an ignorant low IQ opinion I'd just ask a random from the internet and hope I don't get a scientist instead

Just more lies.

five randomised trials, were they all lying? I mean, why not just let people die eh?

[–] 0 pt

This is a great article to read to understand how every organization in the UN operates politically NOT scientifically. Understanding how politics and agenda's work is the first step in understanding the world around you.

How the UN’s climate change panel created a “scientific consensus” on global warming. https://medium.com/@ronanconnolly/how-the-uns-climate-change-panel-created-a-scientific-consensus-on-global-warming-a062f5f54ab2

[–] 0 pt (edited )