WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

Just like people not wanting to speak out against evil because it might make them lose their "money" Pharmaceutical companies and those that are in bed with them don't want to lose their "money". AT what point do you say "screw the money" I'm going to do what's right? I think we know the answer to that. Very few will do it.

Are effective COVID medications like Ivermectin being suppressed because they could cause vaccines to lose government funding? Not very long after the pandemic lockdowns began last year, we heard of a potential treatment for COVID-19 involving the off-label use of an existing medication called Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ).

A French doctor published two studies which showed amazing results. Soon thereafter President Trump mentioned the drug in a press conference as a potential game changer. Dr. Fauci dismissed the studies as “anecdotal”.

Hospital trials and observational studies soon began but they quickly showed the medication to be ineffective as a prophylaxis or as a treatment. But in every study, there was something wrong. Either the dosage was way too high or too low, it was only given to patients in severe stages impossible to recover or without Zinc, which was imperative. It seemed as if only minutes later, HCQ and anyone who mentioned it were viciously attacked for promoting quacks and snake oil.

Then an observational study was published in prestigious medical journals that claimed HCQ was ineffective and dangerous, causing cardiac-related complications. Ongoing trials and testing were halted immediately, and the FDA issued a warning advising HCQ not be used to treat COVID. Then, for the first time in history, the FDA restricted doctors from prescribing an approved medication for off-label use. The WHO and the rest of the world immediately followed suit literally stopping all research and testing of HCQ overnight.

Months later we learn that same study was completely fabricated and fraudulent after an investigative journalist analyzed the data. The study was retracted, but the damage had already been done.

>Just like people not wanting to speak out against evil because it might make them lose their "money" Pharmaceutical companies and those that are in bed with them don't want to lose their "money". AT what point do you say "screw the money" I'm going to do what's right? I think we know the answer to that. Very few will do it. Are effective COVID medications like Ivermectin being suppressed because they could cause vaccines to lose government funding? Not very long after the pandemic lockdowns began last year, we heard of a potential treatment for COVID-19 involving the off-label use of an existing medication called Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). A French doctor published two studies which showed amazing results. Soon thereafter President Trump mentioned the drug in a press conference as a potential game changer. Dr. Fauci dismissed the studies as “anecdotal”. Hospital trials and observational studies soon began but they quickly showed the medication to be ineffective as a prophylaxis or as a treatment. But in every study, there was something wrong. Either the dosage was way too high or too low, it was only given to patients in severe stages impossible to recover or without Zinc, which was imperative. It seemed as if only minutes later, HCQ and anyone who mentioned it were viciously attacked for promoting quacks and snake oil. Then an observational study was published in prestigious medical journals that claimed HCQ was ineffective and dangerous, causing cardiac-related complications. Ongoing trials and testing were halted immediately, and the FDA issued a warning advising HCQ not be used to treat COVID. Then, for the first time in history, the FDA restricted doctors from prescribing an approved medication for off-label use. The WHO and the rest of the world immediately followed suit literally stopping all research and testing of HCQ overnight. Months later we learn that same study was completely fabricated and fraudulent after an investigative journalist analyzed the data. The study was retracted, but the damage had already been done.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Both ivermectin and HCQ are off patent, so yeah

[–] [deleted] 2 pts (edited )

HCQ is a synthetic derivative of Quinine, that we can get from tonic water. Quercetin is also proven to work, you can get it from vitamin shops.

We just need something to get zinc across the cell membrane to do its work and that can be done in a few ways. Ivermectin is yet another way.

People should learn more about how things work and stop thinking "medication" and "prescription" or "doctor", these concepts are really not very good. Also, no such thing as "Covid", that is a story for children like the "boogie man".

This is really more under the category of cancer cure or general health advice.

[–] 1 pt

Both ivermectin and HCQ are off patent

That's the bottom line friend. Great point.