Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

719

Decisive (but targeted, non-ubiquitous) election fraud occurred on November 3. What follows is an explanation and the evidence behind it.

Starting in 1997, Smartmatic systems were developed in Venezuela with built-in functionality permitting precinct administrators to override security features it appeared to incorporate. Among the extraordinary privileges it gave administrators were abilities to: shave votes continuously from one candidate to another;

batch ballots for later “adjudication” but which instead became a pool of votes that the administrator could simply assign to the candidate of choice; generate blank ballots.

Through a series of licensing agreements, bankruptcies, and corporate mergers and acquisitions, that code ended up in various US election systems (e.g., Dominion, ES&S) which (branding aside) still derive from Smartmatic (a.k.a. Sequoia). Thus, they brought to US elections not only the generous functionalities permitting manipulation by administrators, but porous security, extending such powers to those abroad.[i]

Lots more at link. https://www.deepcapture.com/2020/11/election-2020-was-rigged-the-evidence/

Decisive (but targeted, non-ubiquitous) election fraud occurred on November 3. What follows is an explanation and the evidence behind it. Starting in 1997, Smartmatic systems were developed in Venezuela with built-in functionality permitting precinct administrators to override security features it appeared to incorporate. Among the extraordinary privileges it gave administrators were abilities to: shave votes continuously from one candidate to another; batch ballots for later “adjudication” but which instead became a pool of votes that the administrator could simply assign to the candidate of choice; generate blank ballots. Through a series of licensing agreements, bankruptcies, and corporate mergers and acquisitions, that code ended up in various US election systems (e.g., Dominion, ES&S) which (branding aside) still derive from Smartmatic (a.k.a. Sequoia). Thus, they brought to US elections not only the generous functionalities permitting manipulation by administrators, but porous security, extending such powers to those abroad.[i] Lots more at link. https://www.deepcapture.com/2020/11/election-2020-was-rigged-the-evidence/

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (11).
[–] • 2 pts

on November 3, 2020 those systems were used strategically & aggressively to rig our election.

It was strategic in that it was not “widespread” but targeted at six locations[iii] which, if flipped, also would flip the swing states in which they are found (and thus, the electoral college);

It was aggressive for the simple reason that Trump broke their algorithm, because he was on his way to a win that exceeded their ability to overcome through minor cheats alone.

I disagree that the tampering was strategic. I believe it was nationwide. However, in most states it did not play a significant role in the outcome of the vote. Only in states where the vote was close did the electronic tempering swing the vote. States such as California, for example. It failed in most states because of Trump's enormous voter support, which overpowered the electronic tampering, requireing the owners of the Democratic Party to truck in loads of fake paper ballots at 3 AM on election night. An action which totally exposed the fraud for the entire world to see, although our slave media refuses to acknowledge this self-evident truth.