Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

333

Decisive (but targeted, non-ubiquitous) election fraud occurred on November 3. What follows is an explanation and the evidence behind it.

Starting in 1997, Smartmatic systems were developed in Venezuela with built-in functionality permitting precinct administrators to override security features it appeared to incorporate. Among the extraordinary privileges it gave administrators were abilities to: shave votes continuously from one candidate to another;

batch ballots for later “adjudication” but which instead became a pool of votes that the administrator could simply assign to the candidate of choice; generate blank ballots.

Through a series of licensing agreements, bankruptcies, and corporate mergers and acquisitions, that code ended up in various US election systems (e.g., Dominion, ES&S) which (branding aside) still derive from Smartmatic (a.k.a. Sequoia). Thus, they brought to US elections not only the generous functionalities permitting manipulation by administrators, but porous security, extending such powers to those abroad.[i]

Lots more at link. https://www.deepcapture.com/2020/11/election-2020-was-rigged-the-evidence/

Decisive (but targeted, non-ubiquitous) election fraud occurred on November 3. What follows is an explanation and the evidence behind it. Starting in 1997, Smartmatic systems were developed in Venezuela with built-in functionality permitting precinct administrators to override security features it appeared to incorporate. Among the extraordinary privileges it gave administrators were abilities to: shave votes continuously from one candidate to another; batch ballots for later “adjudication” but which instead became a pool of votes that the administrator could simply assign to the candidate of choice; generate blank ballots. Through a series of licensing agreements, bankruptcies, and corporate mergers and acquisitions, that code ended up in various US election systems (e.g., Dominion, ES&S) which (branding aside) still derive from Smartmatic (a.k.a. Sequoia). Thus, they brought to US elections not only the generous functionalities permitting manipulation by administrators, but porous security, extending such powers to those abroad.[i] Lots more at link. https://www.deepcapture.com/2020/11/election-2020-was-rigged-the-evidence/

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (11).
[–] • 0 pt

IF a state were to decertify the election and pressure builds for other states to follow, that could change the dynamics…??🙏🙏

Any thoughts on taking legal advantage of the ignoring of subpoenas? Any legal advantage to adding this to any decertification arguments?

[–] • 0 pt

States can decertify their votes to infinity and beyond and it will have zero affect. They had already certified their Electors by the federal law deadline of 12/8/20. Once that certification of appointment was complete, the next act performed by the Electors on 12/14/21 was a federal act controlled by the US Constitution and federal laws 3 USC ch. 1 secs. 1 thru 21, any State action after the fact is irrelevant. Biden was sworn in and the only ways out are impeachment or 25th Amendment. I hate it but those are the facts. People ignoring subpoenas should be held liable for that action at a minimum losing their jobs.