From the blog mentioned in the article... >I'm not sure if they can prove they've really done anything at all. Its line after line of, if this works out and if they can just figure that out, then maybe they could get this product, that there is actually very little demand for, to market in a few years. It's like that mind-machine interface they keep talking about. A fantasy that they hope will one day pan out in the way they envision it. Nobody has gotten anywhere near success in either case. People with more money than they know what to do with pouring it out to people who will continue to say they will succeed at some point, but are really more interested in keeping the money coming in. >Truth is I don't understand any of this. I don't know if they will get a product on the shelves or if anyone will buy it. After reading all I could find, I don't think any of them know either. I think I do, but it's not about meat. Back to the GWP article... >Bill Gates owns more farmland than anyone else in America today. What about all the land held under the vast network of Vanguard and BlackRock subsidiary companies? I'm sure that with all of it combined, they own much more than BG. And just because BG owns this land doesn't really mean anything as far as lab-grown meat goes. That's just an assumption. I would say that it has more to do with real estate. They want to keep people in the cities where they can be easily controlled. Buying up the choicest land out in the country stops people from moving out of the cities and resettling elsewhere.