Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

What kind of a person would keep drugs that can help people away from people and push vaccines that are questionable at best? What the heck is this?

The latest “conspiracy theorist” to come forward and warn about particulate shedding from those who were recently “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) is none other than Pfizer itself.

The pharma giant’s own documents openly admit that people who were recently jabbed for the Chinese virus can transmit whatever is contained in the syringe to others, including through skin contact.

“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event,” the Pfizer document warns.

“These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.”

In other words, there is something contained in the injections that cause the injected to become “superspreaders.” Pfizer does not indicate what this is, however it does warn that the culprits are people who were recently injected.

Such transmission might occur from a simple handshake or a hug. It will almost certainly happen during sexual activity, which means those who are wanting to avoid contracting whatever poison is inside these things should be sure that their partner did not receive an injection.

The document goes on to reveal that vaccinated women who are pregnant could suffer spontaneous abortions and other reproductive problems – and unvaccinated people who come into contact with them could as well.

Vaccinated mothers can also pass whatever is contained in the Pfizer injection to their babies through tainted breast milk as well.

PFIZER: CORONAVIRUS VACCINE SHEDDING CAN OCCUR THROUGH “INHALATION OR SKIN CONTACT” Pfizer further admits that vaccinated men can transmit viral components to women at the time of conception, meaning both women and their unborn babies could become infected with the poisons through outside contact.

A pregnant woman who is unvaccinated could also pick up the viral components from her doctor or another family member who was vaccinated. According to Pfizer, this can occur “by inhalation or skin contact.”

What kind of a person would keep drugs that can help people away from people and push vaccines that are questionable at best? What the heck is this? The latest “conspiracy theorist” to come forward and warn about particulate shedding from those who were recently “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) is none other than Pfizer itself. The pharma giant’s own documents openly admit that people who were recently jabbed for the Chinese virus can transmit whatever is contained in the syringe to others, including through skin contact. “An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event,” the Pfizer document warns. “These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.” In other words, there is something contained in the injections that cause the injected to become “superspreaders.” Pfizer does not indicate what this is, however it does warn that the culprits are people who were recently injected. Such transmission might occur from a simple handshake or a hug. It will almost certainly happen during sexual activity, which means those who are wanting to avoid contracting whatever poison is inside these things should be sure that their partner did not receive an injection. The document goes on to reveal that vaccinated women who are pregnant could suffer spontaneous abortions and other reproductive problems – and unvaccinated people who come into contact with them could as well. Vaccinated mothers can also pass whatever is contained in the Pfizer injection to their babies through tainted breast milk as well. PFIZER: CORONAVIRUS VACCINE SHEDDING CAN OCCUR THROUGH “INHALATION OR SKIN CONTACT” Pfizer further admits that vaccinated men can transmit viral components to women at the time of conception, meaning both women and their unborn babies could become infected with the poisons through outside contact. A pregnant woman who is unvaccinated could also pick up the viral components from her doctor or another family member who was vaccinated. According to Pfizer, this can occur “by inhalation or skin contact.”

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (35).
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

Here is a counter balance to the article above.

https://vaxopedia.org/2021/05/01/did-the-pfizer-covid-trials-warn-men-to-stay-away-from-pregnant-women/

>An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care

We need to better define occupational exposure by "direct contact" to family or health care providers. This article claims that it would be more in line with an accidental poke or spill from a syringe or vial. Obviously, family members would always have some level of exposure to a participant. Does that constitute "direct exposure"?

>The investigator must report occupational exposure to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, regardless of whether there is an associated SAE.

The study does not refer to "handshake or hug" that I'm aware. This leads me to believe that "occupational exposure" is more in line with an inadvertent jab. Otherwise, everyone in the vicinity and social circle of someone who gets the shot would be expected to report "occupational exposure" to VAERS. Seems unlikely.

[–] • 0 pt

Vaxopedia sounds a lot like wikipedia which is as corrupt as snopes. They are designed to give the liar credibility.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

Yes, but it's really just the doc that we are looking at. Some valid points were raised.

The "handshake and hug" part looks like it was added by the authors of the other article. Again, as far as I know.

Also, the "bestnewshere" is not exactly some sacred cow of journalistic integrity either. lol

[–] • 0 pt

"Also, the "bestnewshere" is not exactly a hub of journalistic integrity either."

Most news sources are not trustworthy but it pays to research what people are throwing out there so you have some ammo when speaking with people who don't research anything.

As far as "shedding" is concerned a lot of reputable people are talking about this so there must be something to it. I personally like it as it gives me reason to stay away from the people that go out and get these known toxins injected into their blood streams.