"Also, the "bestnewshere" is not exactly a hub of journalistic integrity either."
Most news sources are not trustworthy but it pays to research what people are throwing out there so you have some ammo when speaking with people who don't research anything.
As far as "shedding" is concerned a lot of reputable people are talking about this so there must be something to it. I personally like it as it gives me reason to stay away from the people that go out and get these known toxins injected into their blood streams.
You are quite right Patriot, to create confusion the DS MSM including Wikipedia and many others try to confuse people by using the term "Vaccine Shedding" and ridicule those who believe this. Nevertheless, Vaccine Shedding is the INCORRECT term when it comes to the Pfizer and other mRNA shots, being that these are NOT vaccines at all but experimental Mode RiboNucleicAcid transport drugs that are intended to modify your DNA. Nothing complicated there. Real vaccines for Measles, Mumps, Small Pox and Polio cannot shed, but mRNA / RNAi drugs certainly can shed from one host to another. mRNA technology already exists for insect control and is better known as RNAi, RiboNucleicAcid INTERCEPTOR which SELECTIVELY modifies the DNA of chosen insect crop pests. I was shocked when I learned that Pfizer, Moderna and the others were actually going to use mRNA / RNAi technology on HUMANS! The DS knew that if people learned that they were going to be treated with RNAi drugs intended for insect control, they would REFUSE it completely and it would be a worldwide SCANDAL.
Real vaccines for Measles, Mumps, Small Pox and Polio cannot shed, but mRNA / RNAi drugs certainly can shed from one host to another. mRNA technology already exists for insect control and is better known as RNAi, RiboNucleicAcid INTERCEPTOR which SELECTIVELY modifies the DNA of chosen insect crop pests.
Whoa, thanks for the education.
You are welcome. Just to let you know I have just covered a small overview on the subject and would suggest that those interested do more digging into RNAi technology.
Yes, it is in that spirit that I posted the other article.
The Pfizer doc IS somewhat ambiguous as to what constitutes "direct contact" in the context of "occupational exposure". I wish they had defined that more precisely.
I did not see any mention of handshakes or hugs in the Pfizer doc, it was a bit sneaky that they implied that it was in the doc...I don't like things like that.
Unless it is in there somewhere and I haven't noticed it yet, entirely possible. Egg on my face in that case. lol
(post is archived)