Where is the link to "Pfizer’s own documents"?
Where is the link to "Pfizer’s own documents"?
What kind of a person would keep drugs that can help people away from people and push vaccines that are questionable at best? What the heck is this?
The latest “conspiracy theorist” to come forward and warn about particulate shedding from those who were recently “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) is none other than Pfizer itself.
The pharma giant’s own documents openly admit that people who were recently jabbed for the Chinese virus can transmit whatever is contained in the syringe to others, including through skin contact.
“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event,” the Pfizer document warns.
“These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.”
In other words, there is something contained in the injections that cause the injected to become “superspreaders.” Pfizer does not indicate what this is, however it does warn that the culprits are people who were recently injected.
Such transmission might occur from a simple handshake or a hug. It will almost certainly happen during sexual activity, which means those who are wanting to avoid contracting whatever poison is inside these things should be sure that their partner did not receive an injection.
The document goes on to reveal that vaccinated women who are pregnant could suffer spontaneous abortions and other reproductive problems – and unvaccinated people who come into contact with them could as well.
Vaccinated mothers can also pass whatever is contained in the Pfizer injection to their babies through tainted breast milk as well.
PFIZER: CORONAVIRUS VACCINE SHEDDING CAN OCCUR THROUGH “INHALATION OR SKIN CONTACT” Pfizer further admits that vaccinated men can transmit viral components to women at the time of conception, meaning both women and their unborn babies could become infected with the poisons through outside contact.
A pregnant woman who is unvaccinated could also pick up the viral components from her doctor or another family member who was vaccinated. According to Pfizer, this can occur “by inhalation or skin contact.”
What kind of a person would keep drugs that can help people away from people and push vaccines that are questionable at best? What the heck is this?
The latest “conspiracy theorist” to come forward and warn about particulate shedding from those who were recently “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) is none other than Pfizer itself.
The pharma giant’s own documents openly admit that people who were recently jabbed for the Chinese virus can transmit whatever is contained in the syringe to others, including through skin contact.
“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event,” the Pfizer document warns.
“These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.”
In other words, there is something contained in the injections that cause the injected to become “superspreaders.” Pfizer does not indicate what this is, however it does warn that the culprits are people who were recently injected.
Such transmission might occur from a simple handshake or a hug. It will almost certainly happen during sexual activity, which means those who are wanting to avoid contracting whatever poison is inside these things should be sure that their partner did not receive an injection.
The document goes on to reveal that vaccinated women who are pregnant could suffer spontaneous abortions and other reproductive problems – and unvaccinated people who come into contact with them could as well.
Vaccinated mothers can also pass whatever is contained in the Pfizer injection to their babies through tainted breast milk as well.
PFIZER: CORONAVIRUS VACCINE SHEDDING CAN OCCUR THROUGH “INHALATION OR SKIN CONTACT”
Pfizer further admits that vaccinated men can transmit viral components to women at the time of conception, meaning both women and their unborn babies could become infected with the poisons through outside contact.
A pregnant woman who is unvaccinated could also pick up the viral components from her doctor or another family member who was vaccinated. According to Pfizer, this can occur “by inhalation or skin contact.”
Read what Pfizer says, not what is interpreted by the dumbass person who wrote this article. Holy shit that’s not what shedding is.
And this is a fundamental misunderstanding of what occupational exposure is. That doesn’t mean a vaccinated person is going to give it to their family just by being in their presence, or by giving them a high five or a kiss, and what is the “it” that this person is worried about them getting? Be more specific. The person in this article has no idea what they are talking about. No idea at all. This is just blind flailing ignorance. It’s embarrassing. And you should be embarrassed that this was posted here.
The person who wrote this article interpreted this as people getting vaccinated and becoming super spreaders. They actually use that phrase: super spreader. That is not at all, at all, what the statement from Pfizer says. Not even remotely.
Spreading what? Covid? No. That’s impossible. So spreading what then? Spreading particles from inside the vaccine? What particles? How? Explain the science behind that to me. Oh that’s right. You can’t. It’s impossible. This is someone who doesn’t understand what iPfizer is talking about telling you their interpretation of it.
Do you want to know why everyone thinks you people are nuts? Because of shit like this. Do you want to know why they think you don’t understand the science behind vaccines? Because of shit like this. It needs to be rejected. Stuff like this needs to be rejected and you people need to be more careful who you trust. Honestly you are constantly getting tricked, constantly getting cowed by articles that make no sense, predictions that have no chance of coming true, and you run with it. This is why no one believes you. This is why you have no credibility. This is why the average American thinks people who are against vaccines are nuts and ignorant. Shit like this. Exactly this.
Read what Pfizer says, not what is interpreted by the dumbass person who wrote this article. Holy shit that’s not what shedding is.
And this is a fundamental misunderstanding of what occupational exposure is. That doesn’t mean a vaccinated person is going to give it to their family just by being in their presence, or by giving them a high five or a kiss, and what is the “it” that this person is worried about them getting? Be more specific. The person in this article has no idea what they are talking about. No idea at all. This is just blind flailing ignorance. It’s embarrassing. And you should be embarrassed that this was posted here.
The person who wrote this article interpreted this as people getting vaccinated and becoming super spreaders. They actually use that phrase: super spreader. That is not at all, at all, what the statement from Pfizer says. Not even remotely.
Spreading what? Covid? No. That’s impossible. So spreading what then? Spreading particles from inside the vaccine? What particles? How? Explain the science behind that to me. Oh that’s right. You can’t. It’s impossible. This is someone who doesn’t understand what iPfizer is talking about telling you their interpretation of it.
Do you want to know why everyone thinks you people are nuts? Because of shit like this. Do you want to know why they think you don’t understand the science behind vaccines? Because of shit like this. It needs to be rejected. Stuff like this needs to be rejected and you people need to be more careful who you trust. Honestly you are constantly getting tricked, constantly getting cowed by articles that make no sense, predictions that have no chance of coming true, and you run with it. This is why no one believes you. This is why you have no credibility. This is why the average American thinks people who are against vaccines are nuts and ignorant. Shit like this. Exactly this.
I agree with you about the article, but there's far more interesting shit in this supposed "leaked document" (if it's even real) not relating to spiked proteins and viral shedding. https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf
So chill the fuck out. Without saying much, if you work for a biotech company (at least any large one) viral shedding would absolutely fall under occupational exposure. These corps obligate you to report if you happen to hear a random person at a party or something even discussing an adverse event from their drugs.
I agree with you about the article, but there's far more interesting shit in this supposed "leaked document" (if it's even real) not relating to spiked proteins and viral shedding. https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf
So chill the fuck out. Without saying much, if you work for a biotech company (at least any large one) viral shedding would absolutely fall under occupational exposure. These corps obligate you to report if you happen to hear a random person at a party or something even discussing an adverse event from their drugs.
I don't trust their documents though. It seems fishy to me. Like they want the unvaxed to react a certain way towards the vaxxed. We already treat them like retards. Now we're gonna treat them like infectious retards. Kinda like how they treat us.
I don't trust their documents though. It seems fishy to me. Like they want the unvaxed to react a certain way towards the vaxxed. We already treat them like retards. Now we're gonna treat them like infectious retards. Kinda like how they treat us.
Smart to be skeptical. Lots of deceit today.
Smart to be skeptical. Lots of deceit today.
Here is a counter balance to the article above.
>An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care
We need to better define occupational exposure by "direct contact" to family or health care providers. This article claims that it would be more in line with an accidental poke or spill from a syringe or vial. Obviously, family members would always have some level of exposure to a participant. Does that constitute "direct exposure"?
>The investigator must report occupational exposure to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, regardless of whether there is an associated SAE.
The study does not refer to "handshake or hug" that I'm aware. This leads me to believe that "occupational exposure" is more in line with an inadvertent jab. Otherwise, everyone in the vicinity and social circle of someone who gets the shot would be expected to report "occupational exposure" to VAERS. Seems unlikely.
Here is a counter balance to the article above.
https://vaxopedia.org/2021/05/01/did-the-pfizer-covid-trials-warn-men-to-stay-away-from-pregnant-women/
>>An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the
study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons
may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the
trial participant’s care
We need to better define occupational exposure by "direct contact" to family or health care providers. This article claims that it would be more in line with an accidental poke or spill from a syringe or vial. Obviously, family members would always have some level of exposure to a participant. Does that constitute "direct exposure"?
>>The investigator must report occupational exposure to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the
investigator’s awareness, regardless of whether there is an associated SAE.
The study does not refer to "handshake or hug" that I'm aware. This leads me to believe that "occupational exposure" is more in line with an inadvertent jab. Otherwise, everyone in the vicinity and social circle of someone who gets the shot would be expected to report "occupational exposure" to VAERS. Seems unlikely.
Vaxopedia sounds a lot like wikipedia which is as corrupt as snopes. They are designed to give the liar credibility.
Vaxopedia sounds a lot like wikipedia which is as corrupt as snopes. They are designed to give the liar credibility.
Yes, but it's really just the doc that we are looking at. Some valid points were raised.
The "handshake and hug" part looks like it was added by the authors of the other article. Again, as far as I know.
Also, the "bestnewshere" is not exactly some sacred cow of journalistic integrity either. lol
Yes, but it's really just the doc that we are looking at. Some valid points were raised.
The "handshake and hug" part looks like it was added by the authors of the other article. Again, as far as I know.
Also, the "bestnewshere" is not exactly some sacred cow of journalistic integrity either. lol
"Also, the "bestnewshere" is not exactly a hub of journalistic integrity either."
Most news sources are not trustworthy but it pays to research what people are throwing out there so you have some ammo when speaking with people who don't research anything.
As far as "shedding" is concerned a lot of reputable people are talking about this so there must be something to it. I personally like it as it gives me reason to stay away from the people that go out and get these known toxins injected into their blood streams.
"Also, the "bestnewshere" is not exactly a hub of journalistic integrity either."
Most news sources are not trustworthy but it pays to research what people are throwing out there so you have some ammo when speaking with people who don't research anything.
As far as "shedding" is concerned a lot of reputable people are talking about this so there must be something to it. I personally like it as it gives me reason to stay away from the people that go out and get these known toxins injected into their blood streams.
I didn't see a reference to any specific document.
Document name, location, page number, etc.
This is poor journalism, probably some darkie turd.
I didn't see a reference to any specific document.
Document name, location, page number, etc.
This is poor journalism, probably some darkie turd.
I agree, it's poor journalism. I have no idea as to it's authenticity but I believe this is the document their referring to.
https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf
I agree, it's poor journalism. I have no idea as to it's authenticity but I believe this is the document their referring to.
https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf
So because CNN and MS NBC suck, this guy is right? Since because they lie he’s telling the truth and is practicing good journalism? So because they are ignorant he knows what he’s talking about? This is a terrible article. A direct misinterpretation of the material he’s working from. He’s not smart. Why are you defending him? Did you write this? Is this you? Or is it because he’s telling you what you wanna hear?
So because CNN and MS NBC suck, this guy is right? Since because they lie he’s telling the truth and is practicing good journalism? So because they are ignorant he knows what he’s talking about? This is a terrible article. A direct misinterpretation of the material he’s working from. He’s not smart. Why are you defending him? Did you write this? Is this you? Or is it because he’s telling you what you wanna hear?
https://rumble.com/vge2uv-doctor-refuses-to-have-vaxed-patients-around-others.html
I'm not defending anyone, I agreed it's poor journalism ie a poorly written article... I went as far as saying I'm not even sure the source document is real... fuck off faggot
I'm not defending anyone, I agreed it's poor journalism ie a poorly written article... I went as far as saying I'm not even sure the source document is real... fuck off faggot
https://www.acsh.org/news/2020/11/25/covid-19-viral-load-and-shedding-update-15177
This refers to "Covid-19", not the vaccination.
Where is the "pfizer" document referenced in the article?
This refers to "Covid-19", not the vaccination.
Where is the "pfizer" document referenced in the article?
Do some research on shedding.
Do some research on shedding.
Perhaps you can find them on CNN, MSNBC or the NYTimes.
Perhaps you can find them on CNN, MSNBC or the NYTimes.
That's my point. They indoctrinate. Look up terms and educate yourself on the principals we are dealing with. Pfeizer is not alone in shedding. Seems to be a characteristic of these so called vaccines.
That's my point. They indoctrinate. Look up terms and educate yourself on the principals we are dealing with. Pfeizer is not alone in shedding. Seems to be a characteristic of these so called vaccines.
This document is propaganda. It doesn't say the name of the document they're referring to anywhere in the article.
Shedding is fake.
This document is propaganda. It doesn't say the name of the document they're referring to anywhere in the article.
Shedding is fake.
This is a red herring. “Viruses” cannot spread because they don’t exist. What people believe is a virus is actually the detoxification of dead or corrupted cells.
No live virsus has ever been isolated. Ever.
This is a red herring. “Viruses” cannot spread because they don’t exist. What people believe is a virus is actually the detoxification of dead or corrupted cells.
No live virsus has ever been isolated. Ever.
(post is archived)