" I'm not knocking osteopaths but they are not authorities on vaccines."
But it is clear you were "knocking" osteopaths. The irony of saying osteopaths are not authorities on vaccines, is this: Immunologists will admit they understand less than one percent of how the human immune system works. That's really saying they don't know anything about the immune system. From this one can deduce that the "authorities on vaccines" are not really "authorities" at all. History has proven that no vaccine has ever helped mankind. All diseases from the turn of the last century were diminishing before the vaccines were introduced. The most important factor causing these diseases to diminish was due to a vastly improved infrastructure for clean potable drinking water and sanitation treatment. Along with this was improved nutrition. These three things improved greatly the overall health of Americans.
This is the part where I could link you dozens of peer reviewed studies and experiments that absolutely prove how wrong you're statement is about vaccines never helping. And that clean water and food is why diseases were eradicated. But if I took the effort to do that you would just scream big pharma! Or rattle off some word salad full of intellectual dishonesty and big words you don't understand. So I'm not going to waste the effort
As Clint Eastwood once said -- "Go ahead and make my day". Don't get lost in your own word salad or tell me that Big Pharma doesn't have interests for profit. Why is Big Pharma a bigger revenue maker than the fractional reserve banking system for printing money? Well, the FRBS has to restrict their profit making to maintain its believe-ability and longevity. Big Pharma can actually charge more and be more profitable. The pharmaceutical industry does not have extant noble beginnings, but has had origins founded on eugenics. Sounds noble? Not when depopulation is thought to better mankind. It's evil. Plain and simple.
If you provide me dozens of peer reviewed studies and experiments, make sure you provide the sources funding it. This is where you just don't seem to 'get it' in my view concerning vaccines. The science you're relying on is not really 'science' at all, but paid-for results. I've been in the academic industry. Rule #1. Never go against the source funding you. #2. To maintain your 'intellectual' honesty, provide 'positive' ambiguous results and always recommend more research to deliver the 'right' results. Many universities are made for this intellectual dishonesty. My science starts with the most obvious science there is. Only Nature can provide it. Are you denying that treated water, sanitation treatment systems, and good nutrition do not eradicate disease? If you are denying this, let's just end the conversation now because you and me are from different universes. It's so blatantly obvious that we have grown up hearing the differences of nations by being 'first' world and 'third' world nations. Yes, it is about the wealth of nations, but what does money buy? It is spent on improved nutrition, sanitation treatment systems and hygiene (treated potable water). All those things that eliminate and prevent disease.
In Nature it is a transgression and abomination for the piercing into the body for injecting foreign substances into the blood stream. It is not part of the body. All vaccines are irritants to the vascular cellular walls. This in itself tells us the body is traumatized. All vaccines are petro-chemical toxins. The human immune system is infinitely better than any vaccine ever made.
(post is archived)