>And as i said to the other account what other account? >link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Pall "Professor Kenneth Foster, a bioengineer at the University of Pennsylvania has criticised Pall's ideas as using selective evidence that ignores research that finds no link between mobile phone technology and human health" article from guardian that mentions him and why this tinfoil got traction https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jul/26/how-baseless-fears-over-5g-rollout-created-a-health-scare I'm not going to bother to refute what he says because it's always worth doing research, even if it's unpopular, but it's still going to come back to the fact that truckers have sat next to massive CB antennas for decades and nobody though much about it. Certainly change the frequency and you might see different stuff going on, but it's not going to be radically different that all the 5Ghz transceivers we've carried in our pockets for years. Research is going to continue, if bad things eventually happen then they will rethink how to do this, it's not going to be ignored because it will affect them too. If you are that bothered, don't use 5G and the beam won't ever point in your direction, you'll only see an insignificant amount of backscatter