Who said anything about 'nano-bots' ??
you did:
"the 5g stuff may be a way to 'activate and weaponize' the smart dust esp if it were nano-tech"
you can't "activate" dust, but theoretically you can activate nanobots
and while there may be something like chemical weather manipulation, the fact remains that putting Agent Orange into your box of Krispy Kreme doughnuts is a vastly more efficient way to do whatever, and it saves the CIA a fortune on jet fuel...
just because something can be done, doesn't make it any less retarded to even bother trying
Wrong. You can easily 'activate' a nano technology by simply heating it to excite the electrons, esp if it's a 'metallic dust', duh ??. You seem a little simple minded with your obvious lack of understanding that words have more than a single definition or way to use.
Kek, So you even acknowledge chemical whether manipulation is a thing, yet attempt to chide me for making mention of aerial aerosol spraying being used today cause something something 'the cia paying for jet fuel'. Did you get all your talking points from the MSM cause you've proved yourself to have no fcking clue what you're talking bout, worf ...
You can easily 'activate' a nano technology by simply heating it to excite the electrons, esp if it's a 'metallic dust'
so your super smart nano dust gets "activated" when the sun comes up and doesn't need 5G to warm it... lol
So you even acknowledge chemical whether manipulation is a thing
yes it's a "thing", but it's also a "stupid thing"
Waaah, why bother using stuff i don't understand ?? - "jUst lEt thE sUn dO iT."
Jeezus. Let me get this straight, so 'chemical weather manipulation' is a thing, but its just that you think its a 'stupid thing' , that's your reason it isn't happening. Lmao, you truly sound stupid af ...
(post is archived)