>Wahahaa see? even trying to talk to you as an adult is pointless >msm narrative MSN wouldn't understand 5G either >5G is harmful says the guy who doesn't understand any technology >You are absolutely incorrect as 'endless safety studies show EMF's and 5G as well as the levels that continuous exposure is set and regulated at, is provably 'harmful' . Published: 16 March 2021 <--------------------- 5G mobile networks and health—a state-of-the-science review of the research into low-level RF fields above 6 GHz https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-021-00297-6 "The review of experimental studies provided no confirmed evidence that low-level MMWs are associated with biological effects relevant to human health. Many of the studies reporting effects came from the same research groups and the results have not been independently reproduced. The majority of the studies employed low quality methods of exposure assessment and control so the possibility of experimental artefact cannot be excluded. Further, many of the effects reported may have been related to heating from high RF energy deposition so the assertion of a ‘low-level’ effect is questionable in many of the studies. Future studies into the low-level effects of MMWs should improve the experimental design with particular attention to dosimetry and temperature control. The results from epidemiological studies presented little evidence of an association between low-level MMWs and any adverse health effects. Future epidemiological research would benefit from specific investigation on the impact of 5 G and future telecommunication technologies."