Wait a minute, what about 1% being my assumption. Also, that sounds like an opinion piece. Where is your evidence that there is zero evidence? I want to see what the actual stats are.
So you are telling me that you want me to present stats that don't exist and that is the only evidence that is acceptable? lol
You just jump from one thing to another. Nope.
Admit that you were wrong and that I've presented evidence or we're done. I have presented every bit that exists, you retard.
It is an assumption, you don’t know that 1% of deaths (not adverse reaction reports) are submitted.
True, that part is my assumption but less than 1% of adverse events, including deaths are reported.
That it can't be used to determine deaths is THEIR ASSUMPTION. They don't know either.
Tell me what the real stats are, dipshit.
Where is your evidence to back up your assumptions?
Which assumptions are those? What would you like me to back up?
(post is archived)