Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

It has been widely discussed that art is used as a façade for everything from money laundering to concealing cp. The article I just read raised a lot of red flags for me.

First off, the winning bid for this piece of, in my opinion, non-aesthetic digital creation is disgustingly high. We already know that the "art" pieces of suspected pedos are not reflective of beauty, but instead exhibit chaos and morbid ugliness that any normal person who lays eyes upon the pieces would experience revulsion. Example: Tony Podesta's art collection. https://pizzapartyshutdown.wordpress.com/2017/01/27/tony-podesta-and-his-taste-in-artwork/ https://archive.ph/Ao3Sc

It's also been tossed about how digital currencies are the preferred method of payment for cp because it's difficult to track and easy to move on the dark net. Now, I don't know much about nonfungible tokens, so it seems as though this is getting popular among the wealthy who like to spend ungodly amounts of money on things that truly serve no purpose given we're living in CoVID times when us little people are getting strangled with rising costs of food, fuel, and utilities everyone needs to live.

It's also been discussed how cp images can be hidden in digital formats. "Steganography: how al-Qaeda hid secret documents in a porn video" https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/05/steganography-how-al-qaeda-hid-secret-documents-in-a-porn-video/ https://archive.ph/wip/KIJTz

Here's a bit from the article about this piece that sold for an outrageous amount:

Christie's auction house sold its first purely digital artwork Thursday for a record $69 million, the highest price paid for an NFT, or nonfungible token.

The work, “Everydays: The First 5000 Days,” is by Mike Winkelmann, who goes by the name Beeple. The work is a collage of 5,000 drawings, one created and posted every day for the past 13 and a half years.

Originally created with pen and paper and now mostly illustration software, the sketches run the gamut from an angular line drawing of his first baby to Hillary Clinton and well-known cartoon characters.

The winning bidder owns the work in the form of a unique string of code, called a nonfungible token. The piece has no physical presence and will be "delivered directly from Beeple to the buyer, accompanied by a unique NFT encrypted with the artist’s unforgeable signature and uniquely identified on the blockchain," Christie's said.

"The first 10 minutes of this sale we had more than 100 bids placed. We went from an opening bid of $100 to more than $1 million. We had bidders from seven different countries," Davis told Yahoo Finance.

https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/digital-artwork-sells-record-60-million-christie-s-first-nft-n1260544 https://archive.is/wCdx2

I'm not saying that Beeple (I wonder where this nickname came from?) is selling "artwork" with embedded illegal images, but I feel that this type of "artwork" that is selling for massive amounts of currency needs to be looked into more deeply.

It has been widely discussed that art is used as a façade for everything from money laundering to concealing cp. The article I just read raised a lot of red flags for me. First off, the winning bid for this piece of, in my opinion, non-aesthetic digital creation is disgustingly high. We already know that the "art" pieces of suspected pedos are not reflective of beauty, but instead exhibit chaos and morbid ugliness that any normal person who lays eyes upon the pieces would experience revulsion. Example: Tony Podesta's art collection. https://pizzapartyshutdown.wordpress.com/2017/01/27/tony-podesta-and-his-taste-in-artwork/ https://archive.ph/Ao3Sc It's also been tossed about how digital currencies are the preferred method of payment for cp because it's difficult to track and easy to move on the dark net. Now, I don't know much about nonfungible tokens, so it seems as though this is getting popular among the wealthy who like to spend ungodly amounts of money on things that truly serve no purpose given we're living in CoVID times when us little people are getting strangled with rising costs of food, fuel, and utilities everyone needs to live. It's also been discussed how cp images can be hidden in digital formats. "Steganography: how al-Qaeda hid secret documents in a porn video" https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/05/steganography-how-al-qaeda-hid-secret-documents-in-a-porn-video/ https://archive.ph/wip/KIJTz Here's a bit from the article about this piece that sold for an outrageous amount: > Christie's auction house sold its first purely digital artwork Thursday for a record $69 million, the highest price paid for an NFT, or nonfungible token. > The work, “Everydays: The First 5000 Days,” is by Mike Winkelmann, who goes by the name Beeple. The work is a collage of 5,000 drawings, one created and posted every day for the past 13 and a half years. > Originally created with pen and paper and now mostly illustration software, the sketches run the gamut from an angular line drawing of his first baby to Hillary Clinton and well-known cartoon characters. > The winning bidder owns the work in the form of a unique string of code, called a nonfungible token. The piece has no physical presence and will be "delivered directly from Beeple to the buyer, accompanied by a unique NFT encrypted with the artist’s unforgeable signature and uniquely identified on the blockchain," Christie's said. > "The first 10 minutes of this sale we had more than 100 bids placed. We went from an opening bid of $100 to more than $1 million. We had bidders from seven different countries," Davis told Yahoo Finance. https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/digital-artwork-sells-record-60-million-christie-s-first-nft-n1260544 https://archive.is/wCdx2 I'm not saying that Beeple (I wonder where this nickname came from?) is selling "artwork" with embedded illegal images, but I feel that this type of "artwork" that is selling for massive amounts of currency needs to be looked into more deeply.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

As soon as I heard about the nfg tokens and the price for shit like owning jack dorseys first tweet I knew it was for laundering.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, it's pretty transparent. They can get away with it because the topic of using art for money laundering is covered up by the MSM. How to stop these crimes? Maybe if the auction houses are brought up on charges of association and collusion once the criminals are convicted of the laundering and other crimes, we might start to see a dent being made.

[–] • 0 pt

Great post new rabbit hole

[–] • 1 pt

Thanks for appreciating it, fren, and good luck finding more info. I see this thread has already earned a downvote with no explanation. That alone makes me believe I'm over the target.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

There are forum nazis who will downvote you because the post isn't about Q.

[–] • 0 pt

Thanks for commenting, but I think it was a pedo who downvoted me. Just mentioning 'pizzagate' makes them froth at the mouth. Q was originally about stopping the murderous pedos, so any Q follower would not be downvoting this content. Just my two cents though. Could just be an asshole.

[–] • 0 pt

As we "expand our thinking" this will also expand the definition of the subject matter relevant to what Q is about. Exposure. Observation of movement of vast sums of money (digital currencies no less) . Another facet in the "elite''s" interest in "art". Not failing to mention what [they] consider as "art". Why did such a taste in "art" draw our attention in the first place??

All of the hobnobbery (snobbery) that comes with yet another means to show that one is "in" and all the rest of us are "out". Recall that if you are not "in", you then become irrelevant. And are treated as such.

Who among us here would even ascribe such value and importance to these things that stir up excitement and buzz in more "elevated" circles? What one values says alot about who you ARE.

Certainly more here than meets the eye. Therefore it is, IMO, of legit interest. I have presented my case. ; )

[–] • 0 pt

Don’t let the kikefags bring you down this is a fkn astute observation they don’t wanna see reported on this forum. Cheers homie

[–] • 1 pt

Thanks for the kind words, fren, and I dream of the day when trash like the shills and their evil pedo idols are stricken from the earth.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Yes, the deep state down voted you. Holy shit you people. Isn’t it just much more likely that someone is an asshole?

Anyway, I think you are onto something. I am not someone who hates or resents wealth or wealthy people, most of the wealthy people I know are terrific and kind and generous.

But 69 million? For THAT?

I am glad you went out of your way not to defame the artist because for all we know he’s a good person but this is emblematic of what you are talking about and certainly there are countless “transactions” that are incredibly suspicious in a field where the value of the items changing hands is - by DEFINITION - subjective! What better place to hide money or goods than in a field that actually prevents standard valuation.

Interesting reading.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm glad you enjoyed the information I've brought forth and I hope more info is discovered through diligent digging. We definitely haven't scratched the surface of this, but as you specified, we know enough to have our spidey senses tingling. Thanks for complimenting me on how I tiptoed around the artist. However, I find it suspicious that he included an image of Hillary. This fact combined with his popularity in the art world screams that he isn't quite so squeaky clean and is most likely being brought to fame by people we already know are rotten as hell. I wouldn't be surprised if John Podesta owns a piece of his work.

PS - I never mentioned the deep state regarding the downvote, so I think you have me confused with something someone else said. In my opinion, I was downvoted by a pedo who may or may not be connected to powerful monsters. Just mentioning 'pizzagate' sparks anger within pedos among all levels of depravity.

[–] • 0 pt

FWIW: I saw a brief clip of “Beeple” on OAN. He certainly didn’t come off as being very bright.

[–] • 0 pt

LOL! I'm not surprised. I'll have to go find some interviews with this guy. Actually, I'll try to find some photos of him at dinners and parties to see who his friends are. He's got to be pictured with someone. They all are.