Yes. It does. It’s clinically insane and a physical threat to itself and others.
They can't let go. They just won't let go. I am able to sympathize with them. Black pills are never easy to swallow, but this is something like a child not developing beyond wanting to be a fairy princess. At a certain age, you sympathize with the child. Yes, it would be splendid if that was an option in the world. Past a certain age, it becomes a pathology. Anybody still holding on to the Q movement's wishful thinking, and waiting for the military to overthrow the President, has a mental disease.
I can't recall if you are religious or not, Tallest. It doesn't matter for the sake of my point. I had the thought once that Hell could not be eternal fire. The reason why is because that's not the worst of evils. It could still be worse. The Devil, if I think I know him, would not let you sit in the fire for eternity. He'd take you out at unpredictable times, and for unpredictable durations, giving you the hope that you might have found some relief, and then he'd take that hope away, because the worst evil would be not just to torture you, but to torture you by giving you hope first. Now, that doesn't preclude Hell from having fire - but even sustained torture would not be enough. You've got to make someone truly hope, and let the realization dawn on them all-too-slowly that nothing good is coming for them. Hopelessness on top of agony.
I see the Q movement as something like that. It's a profoundly sick thing. It's one thing to just ransack someone's home, take their kids, destroy their lives, etc. It's another to do all of that while you are also giving them the false hope that something is going to make them whole again.
There is no hope in hell. That is one of the punishments - hopelessness. But really, the biggest punishment in hell is the knowledge that your own decisions/actions put you there - you had your whole life to choose heaven, but you chose hell instead, and you will chew on that for eternity.
But this is what troubles me. There can be no evil without goodness. Evil, after all, is just the privation of goodness - so if Hell is indeed an absence of all goodness, we run into a few problems, the first of which is all being is goodness, fundamentally. The second (which follows from the first) is that one could not perceive what you've said without some goodness, just as cold has no meaning without the ability to experience heat. So if goodness is present in whatever Hell is, it follows that hope must also be, since goodness is not simple at the level of experience, and we don't believe God exists in Hell (in the regular sense). So perhaps we say that we take our memories of goodness with us and these are what remain.
Or maybe it's just that your being is continuously being destroyed and regenerated, just to be destroyed again, but that runs into even more problems, namely, where is the recreative power that reconstitutes your being coming from? Is God recreating you just to punish you again? This doesn't mesh well with the view that Hell is truly just the supreme absence of God, i.e. the ultimate separation.
Others might say that it is an immaterial kind of punishment, an agony of the soul itself. But the soul is pure light and this makes no sense, because it does not feel pain. Pain is of a material nature, of an accidental nature, and many of the esoteric veins in religious history have recognized (correctly, I think) that evil is really a vector that moves into greater and greater materiality (as opposed to a movement toward pure spirit).
There are many reasons that I don't believe Hell is what we have culturally come to believe it is, especially since I am a kind of monist, who sees everything that exists as fundamentally one kind of thing: light. The furthest possibility for movement away from the source is into darkness, and we should expect a place having the least light to be ultimately cold. The Jews and Christians depicted the Seraphim, those angels closest to the Holy Throne of God to be burning with the 'love of God', or light. The light is of such a magnificence and power, that the pre-Christian Jews knew it would obliterate man's flesh, and even the spirit could be obliterated. The best example that I've ever heard, which causes this to become a visceral sort of understanding, is to imagine that power from the main power station of your grid could somehow make it to a lightbulb in your home without the voltage being stepped down at any point. What happens if that encounters the lightbulb? It annihilates it. All of creation could be thought of as a kind of transformation process that steps down the energy of God, which has always been just called light.
For my part, I don't believe that any of the classic depictions of Hell can correspond to the reality. Instead, they are straightforward ways of understanding something that is truly spiritual in nature. Whether we freeze or burn, it is least likely to be in the sense we grasp these things physically.
Agreed, I saw one q tard telling another, to kiss their family good bye. So easy for a q tard to expect someone to shut out their family because theyre non believers~ That is a sickness
The Devil, if I think I know him, would not let you sit in the fire for eternity. He'd take you out at unpredictable times, and for unpredictable durations, giving you the hope that you might have found some relief, and then he'd take that hope away
I can’t remember who said it, but there’s a quote that goes something like, “Hell would be bearable, if not for the hope.” I agree completely.
I see the Q movement as something like that. It's a profoundly sick thing.
Operation Trust 2.0, now with internet: that's all the Q operation was. Nothing more, nothing less. Here's the info on it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Trust
It's a short article, but read it. Read it and tell me if anything sounds stunningly familiar.
Unbelievable. That's it. It's all right there. It was probably even tremendously easier given the nature of online communication. It was like dumping colored dye into the river and just watching how the currents flowed.
(post is archived)