The most terrifying thing about Operation Trust, for me, was that the Monarchists had an army still, and they had a good General in Alexander Kutepov (this man was a badass commie-killing machine) at the head of that anti-communist army. But they were tricked by Operation Trust.
If they had ignored the bullshit, and struck when they still had the manpower and the will to fight... who knows what would've happened? Who knows how different Russia would be, how much the damage of communism could've been mitigated? We'll never know, though, because that volunteer army sat on their hands, because they trusted the enemy. And the fates of these men.... you can't imagine a more horrible way for it to end for them. They died knowing they failed.
And that's precisely what Q managed to do with those who believed it, that is, got them to sit on their hands. Then again, given the cultural nature of the attack we have been under, there was never a 'white army' standing. It leads me to think that this had less to do with quelling a proper combative rebellion against their plan, and more to do with pure intelligence. In that regard it achieved two goals. One, it gave followers a lot of red herrings to follow so that the 'autist power' of the people involved was totally misdirected - we might think, perhaps, that if it hadn't been, then properly applied investigation into the past several years might have actually turned up something detrimental to the neo-Bolshevik plan. Two, it acted like Operation Trust did to perfectly identify where Q followers were gathered in online spaces, allowing them to not only track the primary channels for disseminating dissident information, but also to study those places and develop their ideal psychological profiles for the coming 'domestic terrorist' propaganda.
On that latter point, it acts like 'getting out ahead of the storm'. If they could predict the psychological types and talking points of the Q followers and put that information out in the mainstream media ahead of the curve, they could anticipate the normie reaction to all of it, even plan the normie reaction to it. Hence, the underwhelming reaction to the pedophilia discoveries - people had already been primed on just who (conspiratorial domestic terrorists) would be coming with all of that info, and so it cut knees of the response out from under it.
Here is a question for you to ask all Q followers, it is devastating and not one has been able to give a proper answer:
How has Q maintained anonymity for so many years? He is openly declaring himself an "enemy of the deep state" and drip-feeding "sensitive info" to civilians. The "deep state" is allegedly, practically omniscient and omnipotent.
You don't think they'd have outed Q's identity, with proof, in a matter of days if he was actually a threat of any kind? If he was moralizing the targets for genocide (White America), what would be the typical deep state kike method of dealing with him? Having him arrested on spurious, likely faked charges, plant child porn or drugs on them, and then broadcast to the entire planet: "This is Q, a pedophile drug addict who used to get coffee for Trump staffers. This is who conservatives rabidly follow, conservatives are idiots and dangerous and must be destroyed!"
But if Q was one of them... his anonymity suits them perfectly. They can have multiple people colluding to make the most cryptic bullshit posts possible.
I've always been of the opinion that you can't really trust someone who insists on remaining anon, especially in affairs of fucking state where the fate of a nation hangs in the balance. I'll never trust a person who changed their name, unless they changed their name because their parents were retarded hippies who named them "Flower Fucker Jones" or w/e. Someone who changes their name wants to present to you a different identity. If you can't be honest with me about your fucking name, what else are you lying about?
Yeah, I'm looking at you too, Drumpf family. Embarrassed by your name, somehow? Is it associated with something horrible your ancestors did?
Are you saying Trump was not the patrilineal name originally?
Q's anonymity was one of the things that always caused it to fail the sniff test. At first, anonymity is justifiable, but at some point if you want to be taken seriously by followers that you authentically care about, you must make the sacrifice. No legitimate leader can stay in the shadows forever. They have to step into the light and face what is coming. The constant stream of cryptic code for four years is a dead giveaway that Q amounted to a trail of breadcrumbs leading nowhere.
(post is archived)