>The other janitor ... has been caught repeatedly deleting content that 1. disprove its god’s legitimacy and 2. disagree with things that it believes, EXACTLY LIKE WHAT CRENSCH WAS REMOVED FOR DOING. It’s right there in the sub log I'm aware of that issue. >But you are now DEFENDING it and claiming anyone who dares question the clinically insane lunatic’s actions is himself clinically insane. I thought you were saying I had shills that deleted your posts. >You lied. You’re lying here. You’re lying now. Nope, I have had very real talks with my fellow janitor. >There’s more than one regular-level user here who does nothing but personally attack anyone who asks questions of or outright disproves your god, you know. And you think I told users to attack others? I have not done that at all. >You’re objectively wrong and I can prove it. Right here. I don't believe in Q so I'm not really your intended audience, but I'll give it a read. >Questions which cause the aforementioned shills to ATTACK THE QUESTIONER over, rather than even attempt to answer them (in “good faith” as you claim). I wasn't a janitor 9 days ago and I didn't look back on what had been written. I'll look at how you've been treated and delete the comments that are pointless and rude. >If my posts are being deleted for asking questions That's a change GodsAngel and I have made from Crensch's moderation. We do allow question posts as the rules post that is stickied says. >the posts in reply to my posts which don’t answer the questions, but rather attack me personally, need to be removed too. I've been so concerned about people's ire towards Q followers, I haven't thought much about the other way. I'll look out for that going forward.