It's clear you have an agenda as well. Your agenda is to spread disinformation. Ask yourself this: why do none of these videos ever show them put the snowball in a pan and melt it that way? Use critical thinking, or even just plain thinking instead of mindlessly parroting this disinfo.
Weather engineering is a fact. Aerosol spraying is a fact. Through FOIA requests several researchers have determined this. The heat from a lighter is adequate to melt snow. Was there doctoring of the video where the droplets were photoshopped out. I think this is plausible. Do your own research instead of making wild claims that every one has an agenda. Show some counter evidence instead of accusations.
I have done my own research and testing and I don't believe the claims made by weather engineering alarmists. Am I not allowed to have a different, educated opinion of this just because you want it to be real? Am I required to conform to your interpretation of the FOIA information because you loosely read it the way your bias leans? Why are you so afraid of other people having a different view of this sort of stuff? Why do you desperately want it to be real? Are you a nihilist who enjoys death and destruction or some other sociopath?
Show some counter evidence instead of accusations.
Yeah, I'm sure you'll accept my evidence. Just like the flat Earth retards, you will reject anything and everything I provide as evidence since it counters your bias. Why don't you show me your evidence instead and I'll shit all over it with my bias, okay? I know how that game is played so don't try your tricks on me.
"I have done my own research and testing and I don't believe the claims made by weather engineering alarmists."
I'm 'sure' you have looked at the released information on Project Indigo Skyfall, Project Storm Fury, and Operation Pop Eye Weather Control. LOL. Weather modification has been going on since the 1960s and earlier. The technology has only improved and become more powerful. Like this revealed report. (geoengineeringwatch.org) Only a cursury internet search would find this article (geopolitics.co), in which the US Air Force admits weather control. Then there are the patents I mentioned earlier. You don't get a patent unless the invention is provably functional. US Patent 4,686,605 on the “Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere, and/or Magnetosphere.” There so much more to this, I could write dozens of pages on it. Notwithstanding, it is your claim that it is somehow my interpretation of these FOIA produced documents. That's akin to saying you have lying eyes when there's a ssunny sky. I'm not saying this particular cold spell in Texas was weather engineering. I'm only rejecting your "spreading disinformation" thesis. There's may be more to it than meets you myopic eyes.
(post is archived)