Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

677

Climate engineering researcher Dane Wigington says the big snow storm that hit Texas and much of the south is nothing short of weather warfare. Look at the snow that won’t burn in video after video. It’s synthetic, but the mainstream media (MSM) is telling you this is a “hoax”. This is anything but normal. Wigington says, “The bottom line in regard to the flash freeze that Texas was just hit with, we can debate the agenda behind these operations, but the fact that this was not an act of nature is beyond scientific question. . . .Those neck deep in the weather modification program are dictating what the scheduled weather will be. Because of the illegal federal gag order on the National Weather Service and NOAA, our nation’s weather people are actually reading scripts given to them by the geo-engineers themselves. We announced on February 6, almost two weeks before this event happened, that this was coming. So, there is no question this was a massive act of weather warfare. This is only a mere extreme example of what’s been occurring all over the globe for decades. It’s getting worse all the time because the unfolding climate collapse is getting worse all the time. It’s being further fueled by climate engineering. Expect such events to continue and worsen rapidly.” . https://usawatchdog.com/weather-warfare-in-texas-snow-that-doesnt-melt-dane-wigington/

Hmm..

Climate engineering researcher Dane Wigington says the big snow storm that hit Texas and much of the south is nothing short of weather warfare. Look at the snow that won’t burn in video after video. It’s synthetic, but the mainstream media (MSM) is telling you this is a “hoax”. This is anything but normal. Wigington says, “The bottom line in regard to the flash freeze that Texas was just hit with, we can debate the agenda behind these operations, but the fact that this was not an act of nature is beyond scientific question. . . .Those neck deep in the weather modification program are dictating what the scheduled weather will be. Because of the illegal federal gag order on the National Weather Service and NOAA, our nation’s weather people are actually reading scripts given to them by the geo-engineers themselves. We announced on February 6, almost two weeks before this event happened, that this was coming. So, there is no question this was a massive act of weather warfare. This is only a mere extreme example of what’s been occurring all over the globe for decades. It’s getting worse all the time because the unfolding climate collapse is getting worse all the time. It’s being further fueled by climate engineering. Expect such events to continue and worsen rapidly.” . https://usawatchdog.com/weather-warfare-in-texas-snow-that-doesnt-melt-dane-wigington/ Hmm..

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (56).
[–] • 4 pts

Weather engineering is a fact. Aerosol spraying is a fact. Through FOIA requests several researchers have determined this. The heat from a lighter is adequate to melt snow. Was there doctoring of the video where the droplets were photoshopped out. I think this is plausible. Do your own research instead of making wild claims that every one has an agenda. Show some counter evidence instead of accusations.

[–] • 0 pt

I have done my own research and testing and I don't believe the claims made by weather engineering alarmists. Am I not allowed to have a different, educated opinion of this just because you want it to be real? Am I required to conform to your interpretation of the FOIA information because you loosely read it the way your bias leans? Why are you so afraid of other people having a different view of this sort of stuff? Why do you desperately want it to be real? Are you a nihilist who enjoys death and destruction or some other sociopath?

Show some counter evidence instead of accusations.

Yeah, I'm sure you'll accept my evidence. Just like the flat Earth retards, you will reject anything and everything I provide as evidence since it counters your bias. Why don't you show me your evidence instead and I'll shit all over it with my bias, okay? I know how that game is played so don't try your tricks on me.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

"I have done my own research and testing and I don't believe the claims made by weather engineering alarmists."

I'm 'sure' you have looked at the released information on Project Indigo Skyfall, Project Storm Fury, and Operation Pop Eye Weather Control. LOL. Weather modification has been going on since the 1960s and earlier. The technology has only improved and become more powerful. Like this revealed report. (geoengineeringwatch.org) Only a cursury internet search would find this article (geopolitics.co), in which the US Air Force admits weather control. Then there are the patents I mentioned earlier. You don't get a patent unless the invention is provably functional. US Patent 4,686,605 on the “Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere, and/or Magnetosphere.” There so much more to this, I could write dozens of pages on it. Notwithstanding, it is your claim that it is somehow my interpretation of these FOIA produced documents. That's akin to saying you have lying eyes when there's a ssunny sky. I'm not saying this particular cold spell in Texas was weather engineering. I'm only rejecting your "spreading disinformation" thesis. There's may be more to it than meets you myopic eyes.

[–] • 0 pt

Ah yes, I have to use your information in order to qualify as having done research. How do you know that those "sources" aren't disinfo to make our enemies believe we can control the weather? You Q believers don't believe the government, yet you use government information as proof that whatever you want to believe in is real. You're easily tricked and you don't even see that you are being played. It's like when you Q believers say they will throw out the UFO thing as a distraction, but then you on the contrary believe Project Blue Beam is absolutely real. You also believe that Project Looking Glass is real, but every time I've asked for evidence of how it is supposed to work in the real sense of physics, all you Q people would give me is Tesla mumbo jumbo bullshit that you don't have any info on. You are helping to spread disinformation for the jews who are enslaving us. Your own myopic eyes and pea-sized intellect have you Dunning-Kruger affected and you don't even know it. How much longer are you going to allow yourself to be tricked by the jews?

Weather modification is such a generic term and means nothing just like "climate change". I will pose a simple experiment to you that Qtards back on Voat refused to even entertain. You can build a simple spectrometer using a blank DVD disc, a light tight box, a mirror and a cheap web cam. With this spectroscope, you can analyze the spectrum of light from various sources including the sky. There are public databases of spectral lines that characterize atoms and molecules of all sorts. If you build one of these spectrometers and sample the daylight from a chemtrail covered sky, the spectral lines you capture with the open source software would reveal the components of the atmosphere. The absorbed and emitted spectral lines could be compared to the public databases and you could, with a few samples, get the breakdown of the constituents of the atmosphere. This would allow the "metal" aerosols to stand out because one does not expect to find metal in the atmosphere normally. They would also have very distinct and well characterized spectral lines because they are common. If you build this, you can post your proof that metal aerosols are indeed part of the chemtrail conspiracy.

I have posed this experiment to many Q believers and not a single one of them is willing to even entertain the idea that they could use this to prove or disprove chemtrails. They instead call me a shill and accuse me of spreading disinfo. Funny how an experiment that can be done easily and can give them valuable data in defense of their claims is shot down by all and very quickly at that. That was all the proof I needed to know Q followers are full of shit and afraid to put their claims to the test for real. Why be afraid of such a test? Will you do it?