1918 Spanish Flu, only the vaccinated died

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (50).

[–] • 0 pt

Its almost like youre accusing me of lying about quinine content? I told you it is a common experiment, you can finds students labs on the internet who measured the quinine in a tonic water sample. Look for yourself—

Mixed brand tonic 54 mg/l http://lauraclesi.weebly.com/uploads/1/8/4/3/18438281/chem_4553_lr_2.pdf

Unknown brand tonic 35mg/l https://www.coursehero.com/file/95555/Determination-of-Quinine-in-Tonic-Water-by-Fluorescence-Spectrophotometry/

This lab list the fluorescent intensities of several brands in a 25x solution which makes it easy to calculate content

Schweppes—66.25 mg/l Seagrams—56 mg/l Canada dry —63.75 mg/l

https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/experiment-5-determination-quinine-beverages-molecular-fluorescence-spectroscopy-experimen-q52167002

Try to find a fluorometric assay of tonic that is higher than those.

The PCR tests are not faulty, they are being used out of context. People who dont understand what information the PCR test is giving them can be confused by the results.

People whose samples test positve a 30 cycles of amplification of the pcr can produce a positive culture of sars cov 2 in a petri dish 80% of the time. Samples that test positive at only 35 cycles can only be cultured about 3 %.

That is because your likelihood of getting an infection can be modelled as a probability based on the quantity of virus you inhale. At 35 cycles of amplification, people are testing positive for trace amounts of virus unlikely to cause an infection.

Negative at 35 cycles largely rules out the possibility of infection. Positive at 30 cycles or less makes probability of infection highly likely. They should be giving people that information.

There’s a lot of truth to what you are saying. Retarded karens with too much power did more harm than good and behaved hysterically and tyrannically. The virus is real and it really is killing old people though. It killed about 3 or 4 hundred times more people in the last 12 months than the flu typically does.

I dont care to be a sheep of the left or the right, especially when it comes to something as clear cut as a virus that can be studied using some fairly cut and dry metrics.

Government and media will lie alot with the statistics but if you dig in a little bit you can see their math and the real data they are using. Outlets like Breitbart are playing flim flam games with the covid data as much as the MSM. Their math is fucked up. Their interpretations of the science are not great. Go to the source.

Its almost like youre accusing me of lying about quinine content? I told you it is a common experiment, you can finds students labs on the internet who measured the quinine in a tonic water sample. Look for yourself— Mixed brand tonic 54 mg/l http://lauraclesi.weebly.com/uploads/1/8/4/3/18438281/chem_4553_lr_2.pdf Unknown brand tonic 35mg/l https://www.coursehero.com/file/95555/Determination-of-Quinine-in-Tonic-Water-by-Fluorescence-Spectrophotometry/ This lab list the fluorescent intensities of several brands in a 25x solution which makes it easy to calculate content Schweppes—66.25 mg/l Seagrams—56 mg/l Canada dry —63.75 mg/l https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/experiment-5-determination-quinine-beverages-molecular-fluorescence-spectroscopy-experimen-q52167002 Try to find a fluorometric assay of tonic that is higher than those. The PCR tests are not faulty, they are being used out of context. People who dont understand what information the PCR test is giving them can be confused by the results. People whose samples test positve a 30 cycles of amplification of the pcr can produce a positive culture of sars cov 2 in a petri dish 80% of the time. Samples that test positive at only 35 cycles can only be cultured about 3 %. That is because your likelihood of getting an infection can be modelled as a probability based on the quantity of virus you inhale. *At 35 cycles of amplification, people are testing positive for trace amounts of virus unlikely to cause an infection*. Negative at 35 cycles largely rules out the possibility of infection. Positive at 30 cycles or less makes probability of infection highly likely. They should be giving people that information. There’s a lot of truth to what you are saying. Retarded karens with too much power did more harm than good and behaved hysterically and tyrannically. The virus is real and it really is killing old people though. It killed about 3 or 4 hundred times more people in the last 12 months than the flu typically does. I dont care to be a sheep of the left or the right, especially when it comes to something as clear cut as a virus that can be studied using some fairly cut and dry metrics. Government and media will lie alot with the statistics but if you dig in a little bit you can see their math and the real data they are using. Outlets like Breitbart are playing flim flam games with the covid data as much as the MSM. Their math is fucked up. Their interpretations of the science are not great. Go to the source.

parent
link