>A name that's rather famous among UFO enthusiasts and experiencers. They made themselves popular based on their alleged experiences, and should have expected the consequences. Using the victimization stance is all part of the game. Looking deeper, perhaps they weren't 'attacked', but instead painted it that way when they weren't believed and others went as public with their opinions as they did. Who knows? It doesn't stop me from talking about this and saying what I do about Simon Parkes. >Automatically doubting people is what I try not to do. Doubting people or the facts they claim is just as well. If you don't doubt, you're not asking yourself the questions that should be asked before accepting what you're being told. That's the difference between a smart person and a fool. >Imagine what you could get away with if you were an alien entity and knew humans simply did not believe you existed. On the contrary, imagine what they could get away with if everybody just believed the stories that these people tell, without using some intelligent analysis and considering other scenarios. We can't just ignore the fact that Tavistock and MKULTRA were/are using hypnosis and cover memories to hide their programming. Other 'abductees' and programming victims who have been deprogrammed will attest to the fact that this is the case. The elitists who run the major secret societies, including the Freemasons, Rosicrucians, etc. have been exploring and using these methods for a very long time to create a network of programmed diciples for their own use in introducing a one-world religion based on the beliefs we hear from these victims. It seems very apparent that Parkes is one of these.