Its simple. You will wear them until Israel tells you not to.
Its simple. You will wear them until Israel tells you not to.
It’s funny, my whole life all I heard from the left was “my body, my choice”.
Did I imagine that or was that really a thing?
I’m pretty sure it was a thing.
Right?
Yeah, I know it was….it was their slogan justifying why they could kill unborn babies!
That’s right.
Suddenly, when it’s no longer about appeasing Moloch and killing unborn babies, and it’s more about whether I want to have a mask strapped to my face, forcing bacteria back down into my lungs and keeping oxygen restricted, it’s no longer “my body, my choice.”
Weird how that works, right?
Because maybe I’m just weird but I personally don’t think a mask is good for MY health.
And since it’s MY health, I thought I get to make that choice, right?
MY BODY, MY CHOICE.
So I recently asked you a simple question….
How long are you going to continue wearing a mask if you don’t personally want to?
In other words, how long until you rise up and say “NO”:
It’s funny, my whole life all I heard from the left was “my body, my choice”.
Did I imagine that or was that really a thing?
I’m pretty sure it was a thing.
Right?
Yeah, I know it was….it was their slogan justifying why they could kill unborn babies!
That’s right.
Suddenly, when it’s no longer about appeasing Moloch and killing unborn babies, and it’s more about whether I want to have a mask strapped to my face, forcing bacteria back down into my lungs and keeping oxygen restricted, it’s no longer “my body, my choice.”
Weird how that works, right?
Because maybe I’m just weird but I personally don’t think a mask is good for MY health.
And since it’s MY health, I thought I get to make that choice, right?
MY BODY, MY CHOICE.
So I recently asked you a simple question….
How long are you going to continue wearing a mask if you don’t personally want to?
In other words, how long until you rise up and say “NO”:
I only wear one at work because I work in a hospital. Outside of that I don't even have one on me. If a store insists I wear one I turn right around and don't shop there.
I only wear one at work because I work in a hospital. Outside of that I don't even have one on me. If a store insists I wear one I turn right around and don't shop there.
I do not plan on complying because the scientific research says it does not help and may actually harm people.
It’s explained that donning a mask means the infected will spread less virus and the uninfected will be less likely to be infected. Maybe most importantly it will reduce transmission by those who are infected but do not know it because they are at early infection stages or simply never show symptoms as happens with about 50% of those infected.
While this seems logical, the science says it is false. Wearing masks does not reduce influenza infection rate according to an examination of 10 studies looking at this claim. To determine the effectiveness of a procedure requires a randomized controlled test (RCT). Within a population some are given the treatment and others not. By comparing the two populations one can determine if the protocol is effective.
The Center for Disease Control did a pool analysis of 10 RCTs that examined the impact of face masks on reducing influenza infections within a community. They concluded that these studies “found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks.” These studies covered a wide range of environmental settings from University dorms to households, but the results were the same across them all.
“There is limited evidence for their [masks] effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission,” they found. This applied to masks “worn by the infected person for source control OR when worn by uninfected persons.” They unambiguously concluded that there was “no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
Since we know that flu viruses are spread through aspiration, coughing or sneezing, such a result would seem to defy common sense. However it is explainable when examining more closely how the flu spreads. It is spread through continuous extended close contact, and not casual connections.
Research by the National Center for Immunization Research and Surveillance in Australia shows that transmission in COVID-19 infected people, even in close contact with others in a high intensity school environment, is tiny. They arrived at this conclusion by identifying 18 COVID-19 infected individuals and tracing their movements from March to Mid-April 2020. Nine infected students and 9 infected staff across 15 schools were followed. Collectively they had 862 close contacts over this time period. A “close contact” was defined as face to face contact for 15 minutes or in the same room for a minimum of two hours with an infected person. Those in close contact were tested via swabs or blood tests. Of the 735 students and 128 staff members who came in close contact with these 18 cases only 2 infections were identified
With a transmission rate of only 0.2% in an active social arena such as a school without masks, it’s easy to see how wearing masks in a casual environment would not reduce flu infection rates. Specifically since the likelihood of infection from a brief interaction such as a store is so small masks are irrelevant.
It’s reasonable to ask if there’s possible harm from mask usage. Anyone who has worn one while painting or construction or any extended period of time knows they quickly become moist and slimy, which is the ideal breeding ground for bacteria and viruses. Pathogens trapped in the mask have ideal conditions to grow exposing the wearer to an increased risk unless the mask is disposed of after every use or chemically disinfected.
One study looked at 1607 medical care workers and found that cloth masks lead to higher respiratory infection rates. “The rate of influenza-like illness is statistically significantly higher” with cloth masks they concluded. Disturbingly, COVID-19 is an influenza-like virus which attacks the respiratory system, so it’s possible cloth mask wearers may have a higher rate of contracting COVID-19. They speculate that, “Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.”
There’s much we’re learning about this pandemic, but the best science we have shows that mask wearing will not reduce transmission because casual contact is not a common source of transmission. Furthermore the cloth masks that many are resorting to may actually increase the likelihood of an infection achieving the exact opposite of the intended result. I call on health officials to look more closely at the science and withdraw their order for mask wearing because the data says it will do more harm than good to residents.
I do not plan on complying because the scientific research says it does not help and may actually harm people.
It’s explained that donning a mask means the infected will spread less virus and the uninfected will be less likely to be infected. Maybe most importantly it will reduce transmission by those who are infected but do not know it because they are at early infection stages or simply never show symptoms as happens with about 50% of those infected.
While this seems logical, the science says it is false. Wearing masks does not reduce influenza infection rate according to an examination of 10 studies looking at this claim. To determine the effectiveness of a procedure requires a randomized controlled test (RCT). Within a population some are given the treatment and others not. By comparing the two populations one can determine if the protocol is effective.
The Center for Disease Control did a pool analysis of 10 RCTs that examined the impact of face masks on reducing influenza infections within a community. They concluded that these studies “found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks.” These studies covered a wide range of environmental settings from University dorms to households, but the results were the same across them all.
“There is limited evidence for their [masks] effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission,” they found. This applied to masks “worn by the infected person for source control OR when worn by uninfected persons.” They unambiguously concluded that there was “no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
Since we know that flu viruses are spread through aspiration, coughing or sneezing, such a result would seem to defy common sense. However it is explainable when examining more closely how the flu spreads. It is spread through continuous extended close contact, and not casual connections.
Research by the National Center for Immunization Research and Surveillance in Australia shows that transmission in COVID-19 infected people, even in close contact with others in a high intensity school environment, is tiny. They arrived at this conclusion by identifying 18 COVID-19 infected individuals and tracing their movements from March to Mid-April 2020. Nine infected students and 9 infected staff across 15 schools were followed. Collectively they had 862 close contacts over this time period. A “close contact” was defined as face to face contact for 15 minutes or in the same room for a minimum of two hours with an infected person. Those in close contact were tested via swabs or blood tests. Of the 735 students and 128 staff members who came in close contact with these 18 cases only 2 infections were identified
With a transmission rate of only 0.2% in an active social arena such as a school without masks, it’s easy to see how wearing masks in a casual environment would not reduce flu infection rates. Specifically since the likelihood of infection from a brief interaction such as a store is so small masks are irrelevant.
It’s reasonable to ask if there’s possible harm from mask usage. Anyone who has worn one while painting or construction or any extended period of time knows they quickly become moist and slimy, which is the ideal breeding ground for bacteria and viruses. Pathogens trapped in the mask have ideal conditions to grow exposing the wearer to an increased risk unless the mask is disposed of after every use or chemically disinfected.
One study looked at 1607 medical care workers and found that cloth masks lead to higher respiratory infection rates. “The rate of influenza-like illness is statistically significantly higher” with cloth masks they concluded. Disturbingly, COVID-19 is an influenza-like virus which attacks the respiratory system, so it’s possible cloth mask wearers may have a higher rate of contracting COVID-19. They speculate that, “Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.”
There’s much we’re learning about this pandemic, but the best science we have shows that mask wearing will not reduce transmission because casual contact is not a common source of transmission. Furthermore the cloth masks that many are resorting to may actually increase the likelihood of an infection achieving the exact opposite of the intended result. I call on health officials to look more closely at the science and withdraw their order for mask wearing because the data says it will do more harm than good to residents.
"I do not plan on complying because the scientific research says it does not help and
mayactually harm people."
There is plenty of incontrovertible evidence that inhaling your own exhale is indeed harmful to your health. Not too long ago I posted the OSHA regulations respirators and the accompanying information on exhales' harmful effects on your internal organs, especially the heart and brain.
> "I do not plan on complying because the scientific research says it does not help and ~~may~~ actually harm people."
There is plenty of incontrovertible evidence that inhaling your own exhale is indeed harmful to your health. Not too long ago I posted the OSHA regulations respirators and the accompanying information on exhales' harmful effects on your internal organs, especially the heart and brain.
Yeah I know they're harmful. But I'm trying to post a politically correct reason for people who are skeptical to start questioning them. If I sound too much like a conspiracy theorist, people will be turned off and if they google anything mask related, every result for 100 pages is fact check bullshit to keep them wearing masks.
Yeah I know they're harmful. But I'm trying to post a politically correct reason for people who are skeptical to start questioning them. If I sound too much like a conspiracy theorist, people will be turned off and if they google anything mask related, every result for 100 pages is fact check bullshit to keep them wearing masks.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tJxy0EDF2Ui3/
>"I'm trying to post a politically correct reason"
Patriot, you're among friends. There is no "politically correct reason". especially here. That's a dead end with no u-turn. I'm a certified scuba diver. I can tell you breathing in your own exhale is not only dangerous, but deadly.
>>"I'm trying to post a politically correct reason"
Patriot, you're among friends. There is no "politically correct reason". especially here. That's a dead end with no u-turn. I'm a certified scuba diver. I can tell you breathing in your own exhale is not only dangerous, but deadly.
Fuck your PC Perpetual mean anything?
Fuck your PC
Perpetual mean anything?
Good stuff.
Good stuff.
NOOOOOO! U are supposed to care for everyone around you more than ANYTHING!!!
/S
NOOOOOO! U are supposed to care for everyone around you more than ANYTHING!!!
/S
I told this "virulent cretin' and 'leper' to stay away from me so I wouldn't be contaminated by her filthy disease. She walked away.
I told this "virulent cretin' and 'leper' to stay away from me so I wouldn't be contaminated by her filthy disease. She walked away.
I do not plan on complying because the scientific research says it does not help and may actually harm people.
It’s explained that donning a mask means the infected will spread less virus and the uninfected will be less likely to be infected. Maybe most importantly it will reduce transmission by those who are infected but do not know it because they are at early infection stages or simply never show symptoms as happens with about 50% of those infected.
While this seems logical, the science says it is false. Wearing masks does not reduce influenza infection rate according to an examination of 10 studies looking at this claim. To determine the effectiveness of a procedure requires a randomized controlled test (RCT). Within a population some are given the treatment and others not. By comparing the two populations one can determine if the protocol is effective.
The Center for Disease Control did a pool analysis of 10 RCTs that examined the impact of face masks on reducing influenza infections within a community. They concluded that these studies “found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks.” These studies covered a wide range of environmental settings from University dorms to households, but the results were the same across them all.
“There is limited evidence for their [masks] effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission,” they found. This applied to masks “worn by the infected person for source control OR when worn by uninfected persons.” They unambiguously concluded that there was “no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
Since we know that flu viruses are spread through aspiration, coughing or sneezing, such a result would seem to defy common sense. However it is explainable when examining more closely how the flu spreads. It is spread through continuous extended close contact, and not casual connections.
Research by the National Center for Immunization Research and Surveillance in Australia shows that transmission in COVID-19 infected people, even in close contact with others in a high intensity school environment, is tiny. They arrived at this conclusion by identifying 18 COVID-19 infected individuals and tracing their movements from March to Mid-April 2020. Nine infected students and 9 infected staff across 15 schools were followed. Collectively they had 862 close contacts over this time period. A “close contact” was defined as face to face contact for 15 minutes or in the same room for a minimum of two hours with an infected person. Those in close contact were tested via swabs or blood tests. Of the 735 students and 128 staff members who came in close contact with these 18 cases only 2 infections were identified
With a transmission rate of only 0.2% in an active social arena such as a school without masks, it’s easy to see how wearing masks in a casual environment would not reduce flu infection rates. Specifically since the likelihood of infection from a brief interaction such as a store is so small masks are irrelevant.
It’s reasonable to ask if there’s possible harm from mask usage. Anyone who has worn one while painting or construction or any extended period of time knows they quickly become moist and slimy, which is the ideal breeding ground for bacteria and viruses. Pathogens trapped in the mask have ideal conditions to grow exposing the wearer to an increased risk unless the mask is disposed of after every use or chemically disinfected.
One study looked at 1607 medical care workers and found that cloth masks lead to higher respiratory infection rates. “The rate of influenza-like illness is statistically significantly higher” with cloth masks they concluded. Disturbingly, COVID-19 is an influenza-like virus which attacks the respiratory system, so it’s possible cloth mask wearers may have a higher rate of contracting COVID-19. They speculate that, “Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.”
There’s much we’re learning about this pandemic, but the best science we have shows that mask wearing will not reduce transmission because casual contact is not a common source of transmission. Furthermore the cloth masks that many are resorting to may actually increase the likelihood of an infection achieving the exact opposite of the intended result. I call on health officials to look more closely at the science and withdraw their order for mask wearing because the data says it will do more harm than good to residents.
I do not plan on complying because the scientific research says it does not help and may actually harm people.
It’s explained that donning a mask means the infected will spread less virus and the uninfected will be less likely to be infected. Maybe most importantly it will reduce transmission by those who are infected but do not know it because they are at early infection stages or simply never show symptoms as happens with about 50% of those infected.
While this seems logical, the science says it is false. Wearing masks does not reduce influenza infection rate according to an examination of 10 studies looking at this claim. To determine the effectiveness of a procedure requires a randomized controlled test (RCT). Within a population some are given the treatment and others not. By comparing the two populations one can determine if the protocol is effective.
The Center for Disease Control did a pool analysis of 10 RCTs that examined the impact of face masks on reducing influenza infections within a community. They concluded that these studies “found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks.” These studies covered a wide range of environmental settings from University dorms to households, but the results were the same across them all.
“There is limited evidence for their [masks] effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission,” they found. This applied to masks “worn by the infected person for source control OR when worn by uninfected persons.” They unambiguously concluded that there was “no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
Since we know that flu viruses are spread through aspiration, coughing or sneezing, such a result would seem to defy common sense. However it is explainable when examining more closely how the flu spreads. It is spread through continuous extended close contact, and not casual connections.
Research by the National Center for Immunization Research and Surveillance in Australia shows that transmission in COVID-19 infected people, even in close contact with others in a high intensity school environment, is tiny. They arrived at this conclusion by identifying 18 COVID-19 infected individuals and tracing their movements from March to Mid-April 2020. Nine infected students and 9 infected staff across 15 schools were followed. Collectively they had 862 close contacts over this time period. A “close contact” was defined as face to face contact for 15 minutes or in the same room for a minimum of two hours with an infected person. Those in close contact were tested via swabs or blood tests. Of the 735 students and 128 staff members who came in close contact with these 18 cases only 2 infections were identified
With a transmission rate of only 0.2% in an active social arena such as a school without masks, it’s easy to see how wearing masks in a casual environment would not reduce flu infection rates. Specifically since the likelihood of infection from a brief interaction such as a store is so small masks are irrelevant.
It’s reasonable to ask if there’s possible harm from mask usage. Anyone who has worn one while painting or construction or any extended period of time knows they quickly become moist and slimy, which is the ideal breeding ground for bacteria and viruses. Pathogens trapped in the mask have ideal conditions to grow exposing the wearer to an increased risk unless the mask is disposed of after every use or chemically disinfected.
One study looked at 1607 medical care workers and found that cloth masks lead to higher respiratory infection rates. “The rate of influenza-like illness is statistically significantly higher” with cloth masks they concluded. Disturbingly, COVID-19 is an influenza-like virus which attacks the respiratory system, so it’s possible cloth mask wearers may have a higher rate of contracting COVID-19. They speculate that, “Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.”
There’s much we’re learning about this pandemic, but the best science we have shows that mask wearing will not reduce transmission because casual contact is not a common source of transmission. Furthermore the cloth masks that many are resorting to may actually increase the likelihood of an infection achieving the exact opposite of the intended result. I call on health officials to look more closely at the science and withdraw their order for mask wearing because the data says it will do more harm than good to residents.
IIRC, operating rooms are required to have a higher concentration of oxygen in the air due to staff wearing masks for extended periods.
IIRC, operating rooms are required to have a higher concentration of oxygen in the air due to staff wearing masks for extended periods.
You are clearly not watching enough CNN. /s
I will not wear a face diaper. I will spend my money where I am allowed to be a free human
You are clearly not watching enough CNN. /s
I will not wear a face diaper. I will spend my money where I am allowed to be a free human
Got to start before you can continue
Got to start before you can continue
Until Fauci tells me it is safe and all clear and stuff.
Until Fauci tells me it is safe and all clear and stuff.
lolol....
lolol....
Somebody downvoted me lol.
Somebody downvoted me lol.
....smh...
That was funny.
....smh...
That was funny.
Patriot, have not worn a mask, and will continue not to wear one.
Patriot, have not worn a mask, and will continue not to wear one.
Never worn a mask. Never will.
Never worn a mask. Never will.
Have not and will not. Have not had anyone give me shit because they know I'm not a bitch. They have no problem attacking my wife when she shops alone. Bunch of anti science pussies.
If someone tries to stop me I ignore them.
Have not and will not. Have not had anyone give me shit because they know I'm not a bitch. They have no problem attacking my wife when she shops alone. Bunch of anti science pussies.
If someone tries to stop me I ignore them.
I have yet to wear one. I will never comply.
I have yet to wear one. I will never comply.
How will we get our groceries?
How will we get our groceries?
Wear the mask but have it under your nose and breathe thru your nose only. This is what I do because everyone's paranoid as fuck where I live.
Wear the mask but have it under your nose and breathe thru your nose only. This is what I do because everyone's paranoid as fuck where I live.
Yep, that's what I do.
Still nearly had some fights in the store, twice.
Yep, that's what I do.
Still nearly had some fights in the store, twice.
that's what I do too. Some of my best friends are terrified and nothing I can say or do makes a difference to them. I finally just told myself they have the same internet I do, so they will have to choose. Took me a while to find a mask large enough to sort of droop under my nose so I can breathe. None of the stores will let you in without it.
that's what I do too. Some of my best friends are terrified and nothing I can say or do makes a difference to them. I finally just told myself they have the same internet I do, so they will have to choose. Took me a while to find a mask large enough to sort of droop under my nose so I can breathe. None of the stores will let you in without it.
(post is archived)