WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

293

It makes sense if, and only if,Trump is still in office . . . . . It only makes sense if Trump is still president. Prove me wrong1

It makes sense if, and only if,Trump is still in office . . . . . It only makes sense if Trump is still president. Prove me wrong1

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

You mean like how you just did?

Yes, exactly, you've recognized the point I'm trying to make. I'm not claiming that my post here is going to save us, and in fact I am explicitly saying that we will need more direct action. My post is just commentary on the fact that sitting around doing only this will not save us. We need to do more to save our selves.

patronizing remarks

You might see it that way, but I really do feel how I said. Deep down, I think it's obvious that most of the Q followers are good people who genuinely want America to be saved. I just don't think they're ready to face the fact that we have to the ones to save it.

sow doubt

I think the fact that you folks have spent years saying the swamp is just about to be drained, and every prediction that you've concocted based on Q's cryptic riddles has been wrong - that should have sown the doubt. I think the fact that y'all have been saying that Trump's team of secret superheroes is about to save us any day for 4 years, and now Trump's out of office, the country's half locked down, and the Deep State is firmly back in power regardless of obviously losing the election - that would have sown a doubt for anyone willing to take an honest look at the situation. If the reality of our circumstances can't make you genuinely reconsider your position, then I probably couldn't make you doubt no matter what I say. I know that. But yes, I honestly want to nurture some doubt in any useful people who might be willing to do something about this.

sow division

This accusation I don't understand at all. Or maybe you don't understand. I'm saying that we have to unite, because WE have to do this. No government agency, no secret bureaucrat, no funny president - none of them are going to do this for us. It's obvious at this point, imo. WE have to pick up our tools and get to work. WE have to do this together, united, because our numbers are our biggest advantage. We need to recognize the reality of this situation together, because we need to stand together and actually fight.

[–] 0 pt

>"I'm saying that we have to unite, because WE have to do this."

Now you sound like Q. To make it clear, I'm NOT a Q believer, per se. Everything posted there is an enigma to me. The cliche often spoken -- "Trust the plan" is meaningless to me when no one knows actually is privy to the plan. No one can decipher these Q posts. No one can decode the time. It's jibberish to me. What interests me are peoples posts and how it ties into current events. I am opposed to the anti-Q rhetoric saying-- 'he's a larp' and 'dangerous'. It's obvious to me they don't know this, nor do I. Where's the evidence? Again, if it is enigmatic to me, it goes in my Enigma file. It's something hopefully that can be resolved at a later time. It just so happens my Enigma file is the largest file I have. That's how life is. More questions than answers.

I'm saying be careful with what you say. It's easy to be an armchair warrior. Then again, its not advisable to act in any protest because Trump supporters have been demonized and targeted. The rally in Washington DC where over a million people peacefully attended was falsely accused of crimes committed by provocateurs disguised as Trump supporters. The DC police were involved in the false flag operation. There is a very REAL war that's being waged.

There are many anomalies occurring in DC and elsewhere. People are carefully watching the events, reporting them, and sharing it. We are left to discern. These posts help in that regard. People just don't leave their houses to simply act. There is cohesion, coordination, and a trigger point that causes what is otherwise static to become dynamic in nature. When you say -- 'you people are or need to' this sounds patronizing. If you didn't mean it this way, then I understand. The expression might be phrased little differently.