If the House votes for impeachment and the Senates votes to confirm it, Trump would be barred from running for President again - which the establishment wants. Also, it would be a stain on Trump's record - since the establishment doesn't have much to legitimately criticize in Trump's record, obviously they'd love to be able to point to this impeachment while trying to smear him.
Of course it benefits them to have this impeachment, and it is not proof that Trump is still in office.
I hate to be the one who has to break bad news to you Q folks, because I legitimately believe your hearts are in the right place. But you folks have been getting delusional over Trump and Q for a while now. Yeah, the election was obviously stolen and Trump should have been president again. But even if he was, there's no secret cabal of powerful people who'd come in to save us so that we don't have to do anything. All of the structures of power in the West have been stacked against the common man. The only people who will save us is us,and that won't happen until we're willing to stand up and fight. Literally. Not argue and post memes on the internet, not vote for the president with the best tweets, but actually fix this ourselves, directly.
Advising us to:
>"Not argue and post memes on the internet, not vote for the president with the best tweets,..."
You mean like how you just did?
>"I hate to be the one who has to break bad news to you Q folks,...there's no secret cabal of powerful people who'd come in to save us..."
Oh, please spare us your patronizing remarks. To give us a sermon on how you -- "believe y[our] hearts are in the right place" and then tell us --
>No one is going "to save us"
Is by definition classic PsyOP bullshit designed to sow doubt and division.
You mean like how you just did?
Yes, exactly, you've recognized the point I'm trying to make. I'm not claiming that my post here is going to save us, and in fact I am explicitly saying that we will need more direct action. My post is just commentary on the fact that sitting around doing only this will not save us. We need to do more to save our selves.
patronizing remarks
You might see it that way, but I really do feel how I said. Deep down, I think it's obvious that most of the Q followers are good people who genuinely want America to be saved. I just don't think they're ready to face the fact that we have to the ones to save it.
sow doubt
I think the fact that you folks have spent years saying the swamp is just about to be drained, and every prediction that you've concocted based on Q's cryptic riddles has been wrong - that should have sown the doubt. I think the fact that y'all have been saying that Trump's team of secret superheroes is about to save us any day for 4 years, and now Trump's out of office, the country's half locked down, and the Deep State is firmly back in power regardless of obviously losing the election - that would have sown a doubt for anyone willing to take an honest look at the situation. If the reality of our circumstances can't make you genuinely reconsider your position, then I probably couldn't make you doubt no matter what I say. I know that. But yes, I honestly want to nurture some doubt in any useful people who might be willing to do something about this.
sow division
This accusation I don't understand at all. Or maybe you don't understand. I'm saying that we have to unite, because WE have to do this. No government agency, no secret bureaucrat, no funny president - none of them are going to do this for us. It's obvious at this point, imo. WE have to pick up our tools and get to work. WE have to do this together, united, because our numbers are our biggest advantage. We need to recognize the reality of this situation together, because we need to stand together and actually fight.
>"I'm saying that we have to unite, because WE have to do this."
Now you sound like Q. To make it clear, I'm NOT a Q believer, per se. Everything posted there is an enigma to me. The cliche often spoken -- "Trust the plan" is meaningless to me when no one knows actually is privy to the plan. No one can decipher these Q posts. No one can decode the time. It's jibberish to me. What interests me are peoples posts and how it ties into current events. I am opposed to the anti-Q rhetoric saying-- 'he's a larp' and 'dangerous'. It's obvious to me they don't know this, nor do I. Where's the evidence? Again, if it is enigmatic to me, it goes in my Enigma file. It's something hopefully that can be resolved at a later time. It just so happens my Enigma file is the largest file I have. That's how life is. More questions than answers.
I'm saying be careful with what you say. It's easy to be an armchair warrior. Then again, its not advisable to act in any protest because Trump supporters have been demonized and targeted. The rally in Washington DC where over a million people peacefully attended was falsely accused of crimes committed by provocateurs disguised as Trump supporters. The DC police were involved in the false flag operation. There is a very REAL war that's being waged.
There are many anomalies occurring in DC and elsewhere. People are carefully watching the events, reporting them, and sharing it. We are left to discern. These posts help in that regard. People just don't leave their houses to simply act. There is cohesion, coordination, and a trigger point that causes what is otherwise static to become dynamic in nature. When you say -- 'you people are or need to' this sounds patronizing. If you didn't mean it this way, then I understand. The expression might be phrased little differently.
Good damn thing your wrong asshat
I'd love it if I was. I can't promise you that I'm 100% sure I'm right. But it seems pretty obvious, and I've yet to be given a convincing argument otherwise. And the people who do bother to argue are generally from the group of folks that have spent 4 years making predictions about things like the Clintons going to jail, Obama going to jail, a big Declassification coming so the whole Deep State goes to jail, about a Red Wave in 2018, about everyone going to jail for rigging the elections (possibly) in 2018, and rigging it in 2020 (obviously), plus many more, and yet every single prediction has been wrong. If I'm being told that I'm wrong by people who are literally always wrong, then I'm going to want some proof or at least a good argument. I've yet to see it.
Trump, despite winning the 2020 election fairly, is no longer the president. The rotten powers that be are not just about to be put in jail. Q's cryptic codes did not once give you any information that you interpreted correctly to do anything useful, but instead had you on a wild goose chase when you should have been marching. The military went into Syria, following the change in foreign policy of a Biden presidency. Biden's picks to lead government agencies are now there, doing so. The courts refused to hear the evidence of election fraud, and the media will continue to deny it while constantly portraying you and me as the bad guys in our own nation. None of this will change until we stand together, stand up, and actually fight. Voting will not change this. Waiting will not change this. Nobody will save us but ourselves.
Now you tell me what I missed.
BINGO > Of course it benefits them to have this impeachment, and it is not proof that Trump is still in office
grammar, your whole post is spot on.
it doesn't prove that he is NOT still in office . . . . why so many invested in denying reality? Has biden been able to fly on Air Force One? Has the military given the "new" administration any security briefings? Has the white house been dark every night starting at 11:00 PM? Has the NG left DC yet? Did Biden authorize the launch of Spacex spy satellites a few days ago? Why is the fake DOD so concerned about "extremism" in the ranks of the military? No . . . . it's absolutely impossible, not even the slightest chance that Trump is still president ! /s
it doesn't prove that he is NOT still in office Doesn't mean he is.
We have no concrete proof.. so what.. the word is still spinning. as for grammar, he is right we need to act. but not in the way he thinks we should, we are not violent
example of what i am saying, "What they did to a Congresswoman and the crime they pinned on DJT. "
I can't find this i have been looking ( remember election night 2016? )
What happened?
were there riots in streets? - Pre Planned?
Who was president?
Did Obama address the whole nation on National TV? Yes
What did he say? I will not stop them from exorcizing their 1st amendment rights
Isn't that similar to the crime they pinned on DJT? and a representative?
Actions we can do...
Blast that video across all platforms...
Title 18 US Code s/s 242 > DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law
" Mandatory masks " > ALL covid related laws. "
Article 4 sec 4 , Third Clause , US Constitution
shall GUARANTEE protection of Domestic Violence
define the word guarantee as used in contract law.
50 u.s.c. s/s 842 > Proscription of Communist Party, its successors, and subsidiary organizations https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/842
Antifa are Communists ,
This is why Nadler cannot acknowledge antifa
yes i do agree we can do more. Now is our turn to attack ,,, ( caveat , many of us are not on platforms any longer. NP we can feed those that are..)
It barrs him from running for President agin in the Corporation of America.
(post is archived)