Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.0K

Edit: please watch this video from Gene Decode if you haven’t already; he explains the quantum dot technology that was used in every legitimate ballot paper and how the white hats used that to track the election results real time on election night - https://youtu.be/zLQe55LvXV8

Edit: here are a couple of the correct US elections map that Sidney Powell put up - https://poal.co/static/images/qQ9rAD.jpg

https://poal.co/static/images/M1xRCK.jpg

I have heard 80% or 100 million votes was the actual numbers Trump received. This has been restated repeatedly by the likes of Juan O Savin (not a big fan and can’t verify), Charlie Freak (he was first one to claim it via remote viewing), Charlie Ward (idk where he gets it from), and then I saw that electoral college map allegedly from the servers in Germany where Trump won 410 electoral college votes and 40+ states.

I know that’s flimsy but those numbers have been repeated multiple times by even more people than those stated above.

What have you heard?

Edit: please watch this video from Gene Decode if you haven’t already; he explains the quantum dot technology that was used in every legitimate ballot paper and how the white hats used that to track the election results real time on election night - https://youtu.be/zLQe55LvXV8 Edit: here are a couple of the correct US elections map that Sidney Powell put up - https://poal.co/static/images/qQ9rAD.jpg https://poal.co/static/images/M1xRCK.jpg I have heard 80% or 100 million votes was the actual numbers Trump received. This has been restated repeatedly by the likes of Juan O Savin (not a big fan and can’t verify), Charlie Freak (he was first one to claim it via remote viewing), Charlie Ward (idk where he gets it from), and then I saw that electoral college map allegedly from the servers in Germany where Trump won 410 electoral college votes and 40+ states. I know that’s flimsy but those numbers have been repeated multiple times by even more people than those stated above. What have you heard?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (21).
[–] • 1 pt

I also take issue with the idea that some headquarters somewhere was watching the actual election numbers come in separate from what we were being told. It starts at the very local level where votes are being counted. If they're being improperly counted then no headquarters anywhere is going to know what the votes were supposed to be.

Nobody will ever know what the vote counts in this election were, the dems fucked it. What I think on the other hand is very easy to show is that Trump won it by a monumental amount.

In Georgia alone for instance there are hundreds of thousands of provably fraudulent votes. Guiliani talks about it in this video. That's without the aid of any three letter agencies that aren't doing their job. The fraud in Georgia was so massive that the number of people with obituaries who voted is larger than the margin of victory in the state.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vRckA6PqGA&t=12m23s

[–] • 0 pt

I can definitely relate. It seems unbelievable from a number of angles. If this is true, then can they even leverage it as evidence in a court? Since it was unacknowledged technology?

I think Gene said somewhere that Sidney Powell as a tribunal judge was brought in on the project and they had approval from her and the appropriate authorities to use in military court.

That might be the one place where it’s disclosed to really put it the nail in the coffin on these people.

And it word got out to them about it I’m sure they were shitting their pants.

And, all the stuff on the surface, RE: Georgia yes there is more then enough evidence to overturn the election it’s just that the courts are corrupt. So those will go nowhere for now.