Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

205

Edit: please watch this video from Gene Decode if you haven’t already; he explains the quantum dot technology that was used in every legitimate ballot paper and how the white hats used that to track the election results real time on election night - https://youtu.be/zLQe55LvXV8

Edit: here are a couple of the correct US elections map that Sidney Powell put up - https://poal.co/static/images/qQ9rAD.jpg

https://poal.co/static/images/M1xRCK.jpg

I have heard 80% or 100 million votes was the actual numbers Trump received. This has been restated repeatedly by the likes of Juan O Savin (not a big fan and can’t verify), Charlie Freak (he was first one to claim it via remote viewing), Charlie Ward (idk where he gets it from), and then I saw that electoral college map allegedly from the servers in Germany where Trump won 410 electoral college votes and 40+ states.

I know that’s flimsy but those numbers have been repeated multiple times by even more people than those stated above.

What have you heard?

Edit: please watch this video from Gene Decode if you haven’t already; he explains the quantum dot technology that was used in every legitimate ballot paper and how the white hats used that to track the election results real time on election night - https://youtu.be/zLQe55LvXV8 Edit: here are a couple of the correct US elections map that Sidney Powell put up - https://poal.co/static/images/qQ9rAD.jpg https://poal.co/static/images/M1xRCK.jpg I have heard 80% or 100 million votes was the actual numbers Trump received. This has been restated repeatedly by the likes of Juan O Savin (not a big fan and can’t verify), Charlie Freak (he was first one to claim it via remote viewing), Charlie Ward (idk where he gets it from), and then I saw that electoral college map allegedly from the servers in Germany where Trump won 410 electoral college votes and 40+ states. I know that’s flimsy but those numbers have been repeated multiple times by even more people than those stated above. What have you heard?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (21).
[–] • 0 pt

I know of no source, not one, I would believe has comprehensive, credible election data at this time.

What source are you willing to consider as ‘valid’ from anons considering a response to your request?

[–] • 1 pt

I guess I have found the only source — already posted above — please listen in entirety before responding — https://youtu.be/zLQe55LvXV8

[–] • 0 pt

Thanks for endorsing ’Gene The Decoder’ as the only source you consider credible for accurate election data.

I doubt many anons will have contributions that can meet that standard.

[–] • 0 pt

One day you will trust yourself. I can’t tell you how to get there but it’s an important step. As well as building intuition. Life otherwise is a prison of the left brain.