WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.0K

Their retraction-admission validates what President Trump stated in the very beginning of the pandemic.

Funny how that works.

Their retraction-admission validates what President Trump stated in the very beginning of the pandemic. Funny how that works.

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

Patriot, time to call them out and explain this.

[–] 2 pts

The more you look the more you see that so much of modern life is just a lie. The closer you examine the actions the more you see the actual motivation is to deceive and disenfranchise to co-opt and con people. The truth is just so ugly. Government, no distinction between flavours is actively engaged in controlling and misinforming the people all in the aid of enriching and expanding itself. Governments are like a Parasitic Virus.

[–] 1 pt

I agree, especially any actions they take lately. Either for self preservation or other self interest of the DS.

"flavours" - you must be from UK or AU(and up really late)? Americans spell it "flavors".

[–] 1 pt

FUCK just FUCK, you take a look around the world and what do you see? Vlladimir Putin engaged in WHOLESALE THEFT from his country and what does the WORLD DO? China is involved in WHOLESALE THEFT of Intellectual Property and Technology and what does the WORLD DO? Nothing they reward bad behaviour and seek to PROFIT on the sly by enacting enabling legislation and tariffs that create situations where money can be made by exploiting loopholes. The WHO has a song..EMINENCE FRONT..and thats all Government of all flavours are..ITS A PUT ON. Flavour and Colour have one spelling anything else is simply incorrect. I do like the word 'MART though MARKET is a pain

[–] 0 pt

I fucking hate lawyers

[–] 0 pt

You misspelled behavior though.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts
[–] 1 pt

I didn't dig that deep on this, checked publish date on the article, and the guardian article they sourced, not the article the guardian sourced ...

But you are right. It seems like I get burned by articles from National file and Naturalnews too often. I'll think thrice before posting from that site again.

[–] 1 pt

The cracks in the media and Biden administration is apparent. It's only been two days they're eating themselves alive on all fronts, this is spectacular.

[–] 1 pt

The WHO also reduced the cycle count on the PCR test. Florida governor DeSantis pushed to have the cycle count reported on PCR test results.

Soon, the Biden miracle will be proclaimed on CNN - he vanquished the virus/s

[–] 0 pt

The who reduced the cycle count

To what? 30?

The thing about the cycle count, hear me out.

35 cycles might be a good number if you are trying to identify people who could posssibly be infectious. This makes sense if you are boarding an airplane or caring for seniors in a nursing home.

30 cycles is better if you want to identify someone who is probably infectious. If you tell someone who tested possitive only at 35 cycles that they have a covid case, that is stupid. In this instance you are over-estimating real covid infections and giving the person false sense of security that they have immunity.

[–] 0 pt

Ok, but the WHO stated that to be COVID-19 case, you have to show symptoms and have two positive tests.

What happens the number of case drop precipitously.

[–] 0 pt

Who is actually counting cases? Not who. What are their definitions of a case?

[–] 1 pt

Article has a hint of disinformation in there, the retraction occurred in June 2020. Absolutely 0 MsM outlets reported on this and even continue to quote these retracted studies to date.

[–] 0 pt

Yes, an anon caught that a few hours after I posted. Before posting I verified the article publish date, its source article publish date ... but did not go deeper to find the actual study rescission date was months ago. I'll do better ....

[–] 1 pt

I just posted about the sciencemag.org article regarding the retracted studies. Their article is actually calling out the MsM and major talking heads that continue to reference retracted studies as main points of argument against HCQ.

This sciencemag article was published 1/22/2021, 2 days after Biden's inaug. Feels like a movie, Biden's election is being used to rollback all the lock-downs and trap cabal in their crimes, patience.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Hydroxychloroquine inhibits tons of viruses and is an effective treatment for lots of flu like illnesses. It works really well on covid if given early after symptom onset. Once the viral load gets very high, it is less effective because you require higher doses of the drug which are not given because of safety issues.

Obviously the oligopolies that control industrial medicine have been abusing the research study/medical protocol process to smear one of the most effective drugs against covid.

Studies are performed on diseases with experimantal drugs and the results are statistically assessed to determine effectiveness. “Effective” treatments are then rolled out as protocol to doctors and nurses who are supposed to follow them to the letter for consistent results => this is industrialized medicine. It works pretty well but its not individualized in any way. Its a factory following a process.

Research institutions funded by government and big pharma create biased studies which are then the basis of decisions to use/not use a treatment like HCQ. This can be done by performing studies with a biased design ( e.g. only studying HCQ on late stage patients or using only non-randomized subjects) or by statistically manipulating the results.

A lot of doctors are math retarded and dont understand how the data is being manipulated. They are just cogs in the system following factory specs. They dont understand that propensity scoring doesnt render reliable results or that data sets can be cherry picked as well as certain metrics. They dont really understand p scores are sort of arbitrary. Anyway. Some people in public health bureaucracies have figured out how to manipulate all this shit.

All this applies not just to Hydroxychloroquine and covid but also to vaccine safety and alot of psych drugs and cancer drugs. It just took covid for me to really see how bad the problem is.

[–] 1 pt

So if there is an effective treatment doesn't this effectively nullify the need for a vaccine mandate?

[–] 0 pt

Ta-daaa!

Imagine what its like to be a jew and think like this all the time.

[–] 1 pt

This was done last year in June a few weeks after the study was published. It was named #lancetgate.

I know because I was one of the medical researchers who debunked the paper and published the glaring errors on my twitter account which helped get it taken down (twitter.com/arkancideisreal)

The account has of course been terminated by twitter but the story is archived by Chris Martenson here: https://youtu.be/IUD_wvkNhnk

Is there another development in this story just now that I've missed?

[–] 1 pt

I got duped. I checked the publish date of the article I posted (Jan 21 IIRC), the publish date of the article it referenced (Jan 18 IIRC), but I didn't dig down to the 3rd level, the rescission date on the report itself before posting! No, nothing new. And it did seem strangely familiar while reading the article, I figured it was just another faux HCQ trial they quickly produced that was finally being rescinded. Sorry for the confusion, I'll try harder ...

[–] 1 pt

Don't worry. We are all getting duped. It's a constant misinformation battle!

[–] 0 pt

anyone who is dumb enough to think there is a real viral epidemic should kys

ppl who are gay enough to be tricked into shilling for pharma kikes for free should kys twice

kikes who shill for profit should kys 6 million

[–] 0 pt

You are gay. You should kys for tellin people to kys.