WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

838

So this is what you look like! Until now, there have only been computer graphics of the coronavirus. Now, Austrian researchers have photographed SARS-CoV-2 for the first time in 3D.

https://poal.co/static/images/1H0YBv.jpg

So this is what you look like! Until now, there have only been computer graphics of the coronavirus. Now, Austrian researchers have photographed SARS-CoV-2 for the first time in 3D. https://poal.co/static/images/1H0YBv.jpg

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

How is it we have a 3-D "photo" of coronavirus when on July 13th, 2020, the CDC published a document called - CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel. On page 39, in a section titled, Performance Characteristics, it states:

*“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”*

The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”

The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus. It is unavailable. The CDC has no virus that they have found.

A further tip-off is the use of the word “isolates.” This means no isolated virus is available. Another way to put it:

No one has an isolated specimen of the Covid-19 virus.

NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

Therefore, no one has proved that it exists. So, what are we actually looking at above. This sure looks like it was CGI generated. It's similar to the image of Covid-19 that has been publicized all through the pandemic.

How does one create a vaccine for 'something' that has not been isolated? Ever wonder why the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines have over 20 listed adverse reactions plus "Monsterism"? I'm surprised that the kitchen sink isn't listed.

[–] 0 pt

I agree with Jon Rappoport -- the virus has not been isolated, and any "sequences" have been inferred through bioinformatic algorithms and gene database searches. So how can there be a "photo?"

[–] 0 pt (edited )

People often say -- "the common cold has never been cured." Well, one major reason is that viruses are extremely small and hard to see. In all the top medical labs, they are equipped with high powered electron microscopes. All of the types used, instantly kills everything under it. So, on a microscope slide or Petri dish, they are viewing dead carcasses of parasites. Live viruses have not ever been viewed and studied. Even if a live virus was to be seen, how it spreads and infects other people is outside the capability and confines of a Petri dish or laboratory.

We are being conditioned like Pavlov dogs to respond with dread and horror whenever the word virus is used. You ever wonder about all these Zombie movies? What is the pathogen that produces Zombies?

[–] 0 pt

There is no such thing as a live virus, it is just an RNA or DNA sequence with a hull around. To study a virus, you study the RNA/DNA. RNA/DNA sequencing is done since the seventies. Crispering the virus RNA/DNA or deactivating parts of it helps identifying the function of different parts of the RNA/DNA. This was done so often that there are now databases full of sequences and their function.

The process of the infection can be studied by extracting the proteins produced by the cells in the process. Studying the infection of a whole organism can be done with the help of luciferase: They crisper luciferase creating RNA or DNA into the virus RNA or DNA. If a cell gets infected, it starts to produce the luciferase and begins to glow. By this, they can literally see the process of infection in a living organism (they see which organs glow first, and if the glowing vanishes if they apply the medication they test).

[–] 0 pt

“quantified” in that phrase means the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus

My dictionary translates quantify into "quantifizieren", meaning you can put an exact number on it (it is countable, not just "many"). Maybe it's different in English, but they needed an exact number for the experiments, so "countable" makes sense. They tested how many viruses are needed until a PCR test shows a positive result.

Anyway, the CDC has used the RNA of the virus instead of the whole virus for these tests. They have the RNA created out of an open access database with 200,000 RNA samples of the virus from all over the world. To sequence the RNA to fill the database, they needed isolates.

Maybe 100% of the western scientists who filled the Database are corrupt cause of Big Pharma, and 100% of the Chinese scientists are corrupt too cause of CCP, but the "there is no virus" theory needs 100% corrupt scientists from Russia, South Asia, South America, Africa and the rest of the world too - not really likely.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Jon Rappaport provides a very good article on this.

>"They tested how many viruses are needed until a PCR test shows a positive result."

The PCR test isn't really germane to what I posted, since the PCR is incapable of identifying the Covid-19 virus. The inventor of the PCR Test was Dr. Kary B. Mullis, who received a Nobel Prize in Chemistry for this in 1994. In an interview, Dr. Mullis explained:

“The PCR is NOT to be used for diagnosis.”

He said PCR was NOT to be used for a test (and the leaflet coming with the test even says this!).

In January, Prof. Drosden in Germany was tinkering using an OLD SARS VIRUS and threw this test together using Mullis' PCR method! Right away, you should realize it’s NOT a COVID-19 test – but a general coronavirus test (many strains are mild colds and flu). In fact, 15% of colds have long been considered to be coronavirus.

Scientists at Connecticut’s Public Health Laboratory said they’ve discovered a flaw in a manufacturer’s testing system for the coronavirus that’s used by labs around the country (their particular study found 62% false positives). And this is a under-estimate in which other findings indicate a 89% to 94% false positives.

Again, the Jon Rappaport article is talking about Covid-19 isolates, to which the CDC admits they have not found. PCR testing will find a family of similar viruses, but will not isolate Covid-19. The real pandemic is turning out to be the PCR Test itself.