>>"There is no such thing as a live virus, ..." Correct. It is said a virus is neither alive or dead. The point I'm making is that the electron microscopes used in these labs are incapable of seeing a 'live' virus. I'm using this word loosely, instead of something like 'un-dead", even if technically "live" is erroneous. Other science articles use the word 'live' as well. For example, the recently invented "microsphere nanoscope" (nanoscope) can see live viruses for the first time. The article -- "'Nanoscope' makes live viruses visible for first time" discusses it in detail. >>"Luciferase" Good old luciferase. Just as the doctor (Bill Gates) ordered. I read the patent he has on it. Science understands less than 1% of how the human immune system works. Vaccines has its origin in eugenics and it is a very plausible argument that vaccines have never been a benefit to stemming disease. In fact, vaccines have caused more deaths and maiming of individuals than the disease itself. Good nutrition, sanitation, and hygiene has done more to strengthen the immune system of individuals than vaccines will ever do.